From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756391Ab3GVGKV (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jul 2013 02:10:21 -0400 Received: from e23smtp09.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.142]:45771 "EHLO e23smtp09.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756303Ab3GVGKQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jul 2013 02:10:16 -0400 From: Raghavendra K T To: , , , , , , Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, , Raghavendra K T , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:47:31 +0530 Message-Id: <20130722061731.24737.61222.sendpatchset@codeblue> In-Reply-To: <20130722061631.24737.75508.sendpatchset@codeblue> References: <20130722061631.24737.75508.sendpatchset@codeblue> Subject: [PATCH RFC V11 4/18] xen: Defer spinlock setup until boot CPU setup X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 13072217-3568-0000-0000-000003F6B3DE Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org xen: Defer spinlock setup until boot CPU setup From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge There's no need to do it at very early init, and doing it there makes it impossible to use the jump_label machinery. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T --- arch/x86/xen/smp.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c index c1367b2..c3c9bcf 100644 --- a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c +++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c @@ -279,6 +279,7 @@ static void __init xen_smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void) xen_filter_cpu_maps(); xen_setup_vcpu_info_placement(); + xen_init_spinlocks(); } static void __init xen_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus) @@ -680,7 +681,6 @@ void __init xen_smp_init(void) { smp_ops = xen_smp_ops; xen_fill_possible_map(); - xen_init_spinlocks(); } static void __init xen_hvm_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)