From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 11/14] tracing: Simplify the iteration logic in f_start/f_next
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 10:19:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130722142126.049313184@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20130722141947.972915744@goodmis.org
[-- Attachment #1: 0011-tracing-Simplify-the-iteration-logic-in-f_start-f_ne.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3667 bytes --]
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
f_next() looks overcomplicated, and it is not strictly correct
even if this doesn't matter.
Say, FORMAT_FIELD_SEPERATOR should not return NULL (means EOF)
if trace_get_fields() returns an empty list, we should simply
advance to FORMAT_PRINTFMT as we do when we find the end of list.
1. Change f_next() to return "struct list_head *" rather than
"ftrace_event_field *", and change f_show() to do list_entry().
This simplifies the code a bit, only f_show() needs to know
about ftrace_event_field, and f_next() can play with ->prev
directly
2. Change f_next() to not play with ->prev / return inside the
switch() statement. It can simply set node = head/common_head,
the prev-or-advance-to-the-next-magic below does all work.
While at it. f_start() looks overcomplicated too. I don't think
*pos == 0 makes sense as a separate case, just change this code
to do "while" instead of "do/while".
The patch also moves f_start() down, close to f_stop(). This is
purely cosmetic, just to make the locking added by the next patch
more clear/visible.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130718184710.GA4783@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/trace_events.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
index 7a75cb2..76defd9 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
@@ -826,59 +826,33 @@ enum {
static void *f_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
{
struct ftrace_event_call *call = m->private;
- struct ftrace_event_field *field;
struct list_head *common_head = &ftrace_common_fields;
struct list_head *head = trace_get_fields(call);
+ struct list_head *node = v;
(*pos)++;
switch ((unsigned long)v) {
case FORMAT_HEADER:
- if (unlikely(list_empty(common_head)))
- return NULL;
-
- field = list_entry(common_head->prev,
- struct ftrace_event_field, link);
- return field;
+ node = common_head;
+ break;
case FORMAT_FIELD_SEPERATOR:
- if (unlikely(list_empty(head)))
- return NULL;
-
- field = list_entry(head->prev, struct ftrace_event_field, link);
- return field;
+ node = head;
+ break;
case FORMAT_PRINTFMT:
/* all done */
return NULL;
}
- field = v;
- if (field->link.prev == common_head)
+ node = node->prev;
+ if (node == common_head)
return (void *)FORMAT_FIELD_SEPERATOR;
- else if (field->link.prev == head)
+ else if (node == head)
return (void *)FORMAT_PRINTFMT;
-
- field = list_entry(field->link.prev, struct ftrace_event_field, link);
-
- return field;
-}
-
-static void *f_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
-{
- loff_t l = 0;
- void *p;
-
- /* Start by showing the header */
- if (!*pos)
- return (void *)FORMAT_HEADER;
-
- p = (void *)FORMAT_HEADER;
- do {
- p = f_next(m, p, &l);
- } while (p && l < *pos);
-
- return p;
+ else
+ return node;
}
static int f_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
@@ -904,8 +878,7 @@ static int f_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
return 0;
}
- field = v;
-
+ field = list_entry(v, struct ftrace_event_field, link);
/*
* Smartly shows the array type(except dynamic array).
* Normal:
@@ -932,6 +905,17 @@ static int f_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
return 0;
}
+static void *f_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
+{
+ void *p = (void *)FORMAT_HEADER;
+ loff_t l = 0;
+
+ while (l < *pos && p)
+ p = f_next(m, p, &l);
+
+ return p;
+}
+
static void f_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
{
}
--
1.7.10.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-22 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-22 14:19 [PATCH 00/14] [GIT PULL] tracing: fixes, clean ups and optimizations Steven Rostedt
2013-07-22 14:19 ` [PATCH 01/14] tracing: Use correct config guard CONFIG_STACK_TRACER Steven Rostedt
2013-07-22 14:19 ` [PATCH 02/14] tracing: Use trace_seq_puts()/trace_seq_putc() where possible Steven Rostedt
2013-07-22 14:19 ` [PATCH 03/14] tracing: Typo fix on ring buffer comments Steven Rostedt
2013-07-22 14:19 ` [PATCH 04/14] tracing/function: Avoid perf_trace_buf_*() if event_function.perf_events is empty Steven Rostedt
2013-07-22 14:19 ` [PATCH 05/14] tracing/syscall: Avoid perf_trace_buf_*() if sys_data->perf_events " Steven Rostedt
2013-07-22 14:19 ` [PATCH 06/14] tracing/perf: Move the PERF_MAX_TRACE_SIZE check into perf_trace_buf_prepare() Steven Rostedt
2013-07-22 14:19 ` [PATCH 07/14] tracing/kprobe: Wait for disabling all running kprobe handlers Steven Rostedt
2013-07-22 14:19 ` [PATCH 08/14] tracing: Fix error handling to ensure instances can always be removed Steven Rostedt
2013-07-22 14:19 ` [PATCH 09/14] tracing: Miscellaneous fixes for trace_array ref counting Steven Rostedt
2013-07-22 14:19 ` [PATCH 10/14] tracing: Add ref_data to function and fgraph tracer structs Steven Rostedt
2013-07-22 14:19 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2013-07-22 14:19 ` [PATCH 12/14] tracing: Do not (ab)use trace_seq in event_id_read() Steven Rostedt
2013-07-22 14:20 ` [PATCH 13/14] tracing: Kill trace_array->waiter Steven Rostedt
2013-07-22 14:20 ` [PATCH 14/14] tracing: Kill the unbalanced tr->ref++ in tracing_buffers_open() Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130722142126.049313184@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox