From: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] devices cgroup: allow can_attach() if ns_capable
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 14:04:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130723190426.GA9577@tp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOS58YPynQ-QBx5nZEnYrP5kGTVvv9VAj0cV0aYeikTitvTQbA@mail.gmail.com>
Quoting Tejun Heo (tj@kernel.org):
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > This doesn't delegate it into the container. It allows me, on the host,
> > to set the cgroup for a container.
>
> Hmmm? I'm a bit confused. Isn't the description saying that the patch
> allows pseudo-root in userns to change cgroup membership even if it
> isn't actually root?
If task A is uid 1000 on the host, and creates task B as uid X in a new
user namespace, then task A, still being uid 1000 on the host, is
privileged with respect to B and his namespace - i.e.
ns_capable(B->userns, CAP_SYS_ADMIN) is true.
> Besides, I find the whole check rather bogus and would actually much
> prefer just nuking the check and just follow the standard permission
> checks.
I'd be ok with that - but there's one case I'm not sure about: If PAM
sets me up with /sys/fs/cgroup/devices/serge owned by me, then if I'm
thinking right, removing can_attach would mean I could move init into
/sys/fs/cgroup/devices/serge...
Is there something else stopping that from happening?
-serge
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-23 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-23 18:16 [RFC PATCH 1/2] devices cgroup: allow can_attach() if ns_capable Serge Hallyn
2013-07-23 18:18 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] capabilities: allow nice if we are privileged Serge Hallyn
2013-07-24 8:07 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-07-23 18:30 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] devices cgroup: allow can_attach() if ns_capable Tejun Heo
2013-07-23 18:38 ` Serge Hallyn
2013-07-23 18:50 ` Tejun Heo
2013-07-23 19:04 ` Serge Hallyn [this message]
2013-07-23 19:12 ` Tejun Heo
2013-07-23 19:28 ` Serge Hallyn
2013-07-23 19:39 ` Tejun Heo
2013-11-04 21:51 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2013-11-04 22:06 ` Tejun Heo
2013-10-23 0:41 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2013-10-24 10:57 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130723190426.GA9577@tp \
--to=serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).