From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: How to create IRQ mappings in a GPIO driver that doesn't control its IRQ domain ?
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:55:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130725135547.GG9858@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1681089.qGWOhLKTTo@avalon>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 859 bytes --]
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 03:22:29PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Thursday 25 July 2013 14:15:56 Mark Brown wrote:
> > Are the interrupts in a contiguous block in the controller so you can just
> > pass around the controller and a base number?
> In two of the three SoCs I need to fix they are. I've just realized that in
> the last one the interrupts are in two contiguous blocks in two different
> parents. I will thus need at least a list of <parent-phandle base count>. Our
> standard interrupt bindings don't seem to support multiple parents, is that
> something that we want to fix or should I go for custom bindings ?
It seems reasonable to define the bindings in a generic way in case
other people have the same problem but it's possible I may be missing a
trick regarding how to do this in DT so don't take my word for it.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-25 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-23 23:21 How to create IRQ mappings in a GPIO driver that doesn't control its IRQ domain ? Laurent Pinchart
2013-07-24 20:24 ` Grant Likely
2013-07-25 9:42 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-07-25 9:20 ` Linus Walleij
2013-07-25 9:45 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-07-25 13:15 ` Mark Brown
2013-07-25 13:21 ` Linus Walleij
2013-07-25 13:53 ` Mark Brown
2013-07-25 13:22 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-07-25 13:55 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2013-07-28 5:00 ` Grant Likely
2013-07-31 11:14 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-07-25 13:19 ` Linus Walleij
2013-07-28 10:07 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-07-31 11:11 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-07-31 11:29 ` Tomasz Figa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130725135547.GG9858@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox