Re: [PATCH 4/4] ASoc: kirkwood: add DT support

[Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 898 bytes --]

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:14:59AM +0200, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:

> +	if (np) {
> +		priv->burst = 128;		/* might be 32 or 128 */
> +	} else if (data) {

When you posted this before I queried how and why the value might vary -
I see the code is the same and I don't recall a reply.

> -	priv->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> +	priv->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "internal");
>  	if (IS_ERR(priv->clk)) {
> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no clock\n");
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no internal clock\n");
>  		return PTR_ERR(priv->clk);
>  	}

Does the code providing it already name the clock?  If not are updates
needed to do that?

> -	priv->extclk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, "extclk");
> +	priv->extclk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, "external");

Is the clock actually called extclk in the datasheet and so on?  If so
it seems better to stick with that name.  Do any boards need updates for
the new name?

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]