From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, dave@sr71.net,
kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com,
tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com, vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/hotplug, x86: Disable ARCH_MEMORY_PROBE by default
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 23:38:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130725213822.GG18254@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1374685121.16322.218.camel@misato.fc.hp.com>
* Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> wrote:
> > You claimed that the only purpose of this on x86 was
> > that testing was done on non-hotplug systems, using
> > this interface. Non-hotplug systems have e820 maps.
>
> Right. Sorry, I first thought that the interface needed
> to work as defined, i.e. detect a new memory. But for
> the test purpose on non-hotplug systems, that is not
> necessary. So, I agree that we can check e820.
>
> I summarized two options in the email below.
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/23/602
>
> Option 1) adds a check with e820. Option 2) deprecates
> the interface by removing the config option from x86
> Kconfig. I was thinking that we could evaluate two
> options after this patch gets in. Does it make sense?
Yeah.
That having said, if the e820 check is too difficult to
pull off straight away, I also don't mind keeping it as-is
if it's useful for testing. Just make sure you document it
as "you need to be careful with this" (beyond it being a
root-only interface to begin with).
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-25 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-19 17:47 [PATCH v2] mm/hotplug, x86: Disable ARCH_MEMORY_PROBE by default Toshi Kani
2013-07-19 19:30 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-07-19 19:35 ` Toshi Kani
2013-07-22 8:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-07-22 17:12 ` Toshi Kani
2013-07-22 20:57 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-07-22 21:04 ` Dave Hansen
2013-07-23 0:34 ` Toshi Kani
2013-07-23 8:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-07-23 20:45 ` Toshi Kani
2013-07-23 20:59 ` Dave Hansen
2013-07-23 21:34 ` Toshi Kani
2013-07-24 0:18 ` Hush Bensen
2013-07-24 16:02 ` Toshi Kani
2013-07-25 0:17 ` Hush Bensen
2013-07-25 15:47 ` Toshi Kani
2013-07-25 0:44 ` Hush Bensen
2013-07-25 0:56 ` Hush Bensen
2013-07-25 3:08 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-07-25 3:34 ` Hush Bensen
2013-07-25 4:55 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-07-24 4:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-07-24 16:58 ` Toshi Kani
2013-07-25 21:38 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-07-25 22:36 ` Toshi Kani
2013-07-23 0:24 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-07-23 0:45 ` Toshi Kani
2013-07-23 7:46 ` [tip:x86/mm] " tip-bot for Toshi Kani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130725213822.GG18254@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave@sr71.net \
--cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
--cc=vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).