public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
To: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@mm-sol.com>
Cc: Paul Zimmerman <Paul.Zimmerman@synopsys.com>,
	"balbi@ti.com" <balbi@ti.com>,
	"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: core: modify IO memory resource after deferred probe completes
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 12:53:47 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130726095347.GA2970@radagast> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1374821306.1956.34.camel@iivanov-dev.int.mm-sol.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1337 bytes --]

Hi,

On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 09:48:26AM +0300, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> > > Also, this is not *modifying* what was passed, just skipping the xHCI
> > > address space so we don't request_mem_region() an area we won't really
> > > handle and prevent xhci-hcd.ko from probing.
> > 
> > Hmm? platform_get_resource() returns a pointer to an entry in the
> > platform_device's resource[] array. And "res->start +=" modifies the
> > entry pointed at. If it didn't, the bug fixed by this patch wouldn't
> > have happened.
> > 
> > Are you sure this code will work OK if you build the driver as a module,
> > modprobe it, rmmod it, and then modprobe it again? Seems like it won't,
> > unless the dev->resource[] array gets reinitialized in between somehow.

gotta try that one... Perhaps the correct way would be to copy the
resource to a private struct resource and modify that one, leaving
pdev->resources untouched.

> In addition, I think driver is wasting memory, because on every probe
> it will reallocate driver state variable. This also happens in several 
> other drivers which are using deferred probe.

We can't do much about this since we're using devm_* API. Perhaps
deferred probe should make sure to destroy the device and add it back
later ? Otherwise what's the benefit of using devm_* ?

-- 
balbi

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-26  9:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-25 16:26 [PATCH] usb: dwc3: core: modify IO memory resource after deferred probe completes Ivan T. Ivanov
2013-07-25 17:21 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-07-25 18:20   ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2013-07-25 19:46 ` Paul Zimmerman
2013-07-25 20:52   ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-26  2:06     ` Paul Zimmerman
2013-07-26  6:48       ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2013-07-26  9:53         ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2013-07-26 18:44           ` Paul Zimmerman
2013-07-26 20:32             ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-26 22:02               ` Paul Zimmerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130726095347.GA2970@radagast \
    --to=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=Paul.Zimmerman@synopsys.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=iivanov@mm-sol.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox