public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, davej@redhat.com,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, glommer@parallels.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] bdi: add a new writeback list for sync
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 15:59:31 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130801055931.GP7118@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130731151114.GG22930@quack.suse.cz>

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 05:11:14PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 31-07-13 14:15:45, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >  /*
> > + * mark an inode as under writeback on the given bdi
> > + */
> > +void bdi_mark_inode_writeback(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, struct inode *inode)
> > +{
> > +	WARN_ON_ONCE(bdi != inode_to_bdi(inode));
> > +	if (list_empty(&inode->i_wb_list)) {
> > +		spin_lock(&bdi->wb.list_lock);
> > +		if (list_empty(&inode->i_wb_list))
> > +			list_add_tail(&inode->i_wb_list, &bdi->wb.b_writeback);
> > +		spin_unlock(&bdi->wb.list_lock);
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * clear an inode as under writeback on the given bdi
> > + */
> > +static void bdi_clear_inode_writeback(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
> > +				      struct inode *inode)
> > +{
> > +	WARN_ON_ONCE(bdi != inode_to_bdi(inode));
> > +	if (!list_empty(&inode->i_wb_list)) {
> > +		spin_lock(&bdi->wb.list_lock);
> > +		list_del_init(&inode->i_wb_list);
> > +		spin_unlock(&bdi->wb.list_lock);
> > +	}
> > +}
>   Umm, are these list_empty() checks without lock really safe?

I think they are.....

>   Looking into
> the code in more detail, it seems that mapping->tree_lock saves us from
> races between insert & removal but it definitely deserves a comment (or maybe
> even an assertion) that the function requires it.
> bdi_clear_inode_writeback() is safe only because it is called only when the
> inode is practically dead. Again, I think it deserves a comment...

Ok.

> > @@ -1264,9 +1330,21 @@ static void wait_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb)
> >  
> >  		cond_resched();
> >  
> > -		spin_lock(&sb->s_inode_list_lock);
> > +                /*
> > +                 * the inode has been written back now, so check whether we
> > +                 * still have pages under IO and move it back to the primary
> > +                 * list if necessary
> > +                 */
> > +                spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
> > +                spin_lock(&bdi->wb.list_lock);
> > +                if (mapping_tagged(mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_WRITEBACK)) {
> > +                        WARN_ON(list_empty(&inode->i_wb_list));
> > +                        list_move(&inode->i_wb_list, &bdi->wb.b_writeback);
> > +                } else
> > +			list_del_init(&inode->i_wb_list);
> > +                spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
>   Whitespace is damaged in the above hunk...

Bizarre. I'll fix it.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-01  5:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-31  4:15 [PATCH 00/11] Sync and VFS scalability improvements Dave Chinner
2013-07-31  4:15 ` [PATCH 01/11] writeback: plug writeback at a high level Dave Chinner
2013-07-31 14:40   ` Jan Kara
2013-08-01  5:48     ` Dave Chinner
2013-08-01  8:34       ` Jan Kara
2013-07-31  4:15 ` [PATCH 02/11] inode: add IOP_NOTHASHED to avoid inode hash lock in evict Dave Chinner
2013-07-31 14:44   ` Jan Kara
2013-08-01  8:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-08-02  1:11     ` Dave Chinner
2013-08-02 14:32       ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-07-31  4:15 ` [PATCH 03/11] inode: convert inode_sb_list_lock to per-sb Dave Chinner
2013-07-31 14:48   ` Jan Kara
2013-07-31  4:15 ` [PATCH 04/11] sync: serialise per-superblock sync operations Dave Chinner
2013-07-31 15:12   ` Jan Kara
2013-07-31  4:15 ` [PATCH 05/11] inode: rename i_wb_list to i_io_list Dave Chinner
2013-07-31 14:51   ` Jan Kara
2013-07-31  4:15 ` [PATCH 06/11] bdi: add a new writeback list for sync Dave Chinner
2013-07-31 15:11   ` Jan Kara
2013-08-01  5:59     ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2013-07-31  4:15 ` [PATCH 07/11] writeback: periodically trim the writeback list Dave Chinner
2013-07-31 15:15   ` Jan Kara
2013-08-01  6:16     ` Dave Chinner
2013-08-01  9:03       ` Jan Kara
2013-07-31  4:15 ` [PATCH 08/11] inode: convert per-sb inode list to a list_lru Dave Chinner
2013-08-01  8:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-08-02  1:06     ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-31  4:15 ` [PATCH 09/11] fs: Use RCU lookups for inode cache Dave Chinner
2013-07-31  4:15 ` [PATCH 10/11] list_lru: don't need node lock in list_lru_count_node Dave Chinner
2013-07-31  4:15 ` [PATCH 11/11] list_lru: don't lock during add/del if unnecessary Dave Chinner
2013-07-31  6:48 ` [PATCH 00/11] Sync and VFS scalability improvements Sedat Dilek
2013-08-01  6:19   ` Dave Chinner
2013-08-01  6:31     ` Sedat Dilek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130801055931.GP7118@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=glommer@parallels.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox