From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752701Ab3HAITx (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:19:53 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:43389 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750856Ab3HAITu (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:19:50 -0400 Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 01:19:50 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Dave Chinner Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, davej@redhat.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz, glommer@parallels.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] inode: convert per-sb inode list to a list_lru Message-ID: <20130801081950.GA18828@infradead.org> References: <1375244150-27296-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1375244150-27296-9-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1375244150-27296-9-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At this point the list_lru name really becomes confusing. Given that it's not really LRU specific maybe just rename it to pernode_list or similar?