public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Zach Levis <zml@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] exec: move allow_write_access/fput to exec_binprm()
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 21:27:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130802192734.GA9565@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130802192713.GA9543@redhat.com>

When search_binary_handler() succeeds it does allow_write_access()
and fput(), then it clears bprm->file to ensure the caller will not
do the same.

We can simply move this code to exec_binprm() which is called only
once. In fact we could move this to free_bprm() and remove the same
code in do_execve_common's error path.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
 fs/exec.c |    9 +++++----
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index ad7d624..ef70320 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1400,10 +1400,6 @@ int search_binary_handler(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 			bprm->recursion_depth--;
 			if (retval >= 0) {
 				put_binfmt(fmt);
-				allow_write_access(bprm->file);
-				if (bprm->file)
-					fput(bprm->file);
-				bprm->file = NULL;
 				return retval;
 			}
 			read_lock(&binfmt_lock);
@@ -1455,6 +1451,11 @@ static int exec_binprm(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 		ptrace_event(PTRACE_EVENT_EXEC, old_vpid);
 		current->did_exec = 1;
 		proc_exec_connector(current);
+
+		if (bprm->file) {
+			allow_write_access(bprm->file);
+			fput(bprm->file);
+		}
 	}
 
 	return ret;
-- 
1.5.5.1


  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-02 19:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-02 19:27 [PATCH 0/5] exec: more cleanups Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-02 19:27 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-08-03 19:27   ` [PATCH 1/5] exec: move allow_write_access/fput to exec_binprm() Kees Cook
2013-08-04 14:48     ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-02 19:27 ` [PATCH 2/5] exec: kill ->load_binary != NULL check in search_binary_handler() Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-02 19:27 ` [PATCH 3/5] exec: cleanup the CONFIG_MODULES logic Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-02 19:27 ` [PATCH 4/5] exec: don't retry if request_module() fails Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-02 19:27 ` [PATCH 5/5] exec: cleanup the error handling in search_binary_handler() Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-03 19:28 ` [PATCH 0/5] exec: more cleanups Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130802192734.GA9565@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=zbr@ioremap.net \
    --cc=zml@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox