From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754471Ab3HBWtW (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Aug 2013 18:49:22 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:46449 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753199Ab3HBWtT (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Aug 2013 18:49:19 -0400 Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 06:50:36 +0800 From: Greg KH To: Joe Perches Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC v01 0/3] Power Capping Framework Message-ID: <20130802225036.GA29458@kroah.com> References: <1375466932-11842-1-git-send-email-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> <20130802223020.GB28831@kroah.com> <1375482806.2034.140.camel@joe-AO722> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1375482806.2034.140.camel@joe-AO722> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 03:33:26PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 06:30 +0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 11:08:49AM -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > > > Once this framework is approved, we will submit a RAPL client driver using this > > > framework. > > > > Also, given that you work with a lot of kernel developers, I would like > > to see their review and signed-off-by: on these patches before you > > resend them, please. That way I know that they agree with this > > framework as a way for their future changes in this area. > > Before is a bit hard on public mailing lists isn't it? That's implying that Intel doesn't have internal mailing lists where kernel patches are reviewed and proposed before being made public... > Shouldn't the reviewed-by/acked-by/signed-off-by's be > done after a real patch is submitted? That's fine too, but then the needed people need to be cc:ed. thanks, greg k-h