public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Zach Levis <zml@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/8] exec: introduce exec_binprm() for "depth == 0" code
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:41:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130805134130.GA15622@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130805134113.GA15603@redhat.com>

task_pid_nr_ns() and trace/ptrace code in the middle of the
recursive search_binary_handler() looks confusing and imho
annoying. We only need this code if "depth == 0", lets add
a simple helper which calls search_binary_handler() and does
trace_sched_process_exec() + ptrace_event().

The patch also moves the setting of task->did_exec, we need
to do this only once.

Note: we can kill either task->did_exec or PF_FORKNOEXEC.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
 fs/exec.c |   36 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index 9c73def..a9ae4f2 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1373,7 +1373,6 @@ int search_binary_handler(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 	unsigned int depth = bprm->recursion_depth;
 	int try,retval;
 	struct linux_binfmt *fmt;
-	pid_t old_pid, old_vpid;
 
 	/* This allows 4 levels of binfmt rewrites before failing hard. */
 	if (depth > 5)
@@ -1387,12 +1386,6 @@ int search_binary_handler(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 	if (retval)
 		return retval;
 
-	/* Need to fetch pid before load_binary changes it */
-	old_pid = current->pid;
-	rcu_read_lock();
-	old_vpid = task_pid_nr_ns(current, task_active_pid_ns(current->parent));
-	rcu_read_unlock();
-
 	retval = -ENOENT;
 	for (try=0; try<2; try++) {
 		read_lock(&binfmt_lock);
@@ -1407,16 +1400,11 @@ int search_binary_handler(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 			retval = fn(bprm);
 			bprm->recursion_depth = depth;
 			if (retval >= 0) {
-				if (depth == 0) {
-					trace_sched_process_exec(current, old_pid, bprm);
-					ptrace_event(PTRACE_EVENT_EXEC, old_vpid);
-				}
 				put_binfmt(fmt);
 				allow_write_access(bprm->file);
 				if (bprm->file)
 					fput(bprm->file);
 				bprm->file = NULL;
-				current->did_exec = 1;
 				proc_exec_connector(current);
 				return retval;
 			}
@@ -1450,9 +1438,29 @@ int search_binary_handler(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 	}
 	return retval;
 }
-
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(search_binary_handler);
 
+static int exec_binprm(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
+{
+	pid_t old_pid, old_vpid;
+	int ret;
+
+	/* Need to fetch pid before load_binary changes it */
+	old_pid = current->pid;
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	old_vpid = task_pid_nr_ns(current, task_active_pid_ns(current->parent));
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
+	ret = search_binary_handler(bprm);
+	if (ret >= 0) {
+		trace_sched_process_exec(current, old_pid, bprm);
+		ptrace_event(PTRACE_EVENT_EXEC, old_vpid);
+		current->did_exec = 1;
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /*
  * sys_execve() executes a new program.
  */
@@ -1541,7 +1549,7 @@ static int do_execve_common(const char *filename,
 	if (retval < 0)
 		goto out;
 
-	retval = search_binary_handler(bprm);
+	retval = exec_binprm(bprm);
 	if (retval < 0)
 		goto out;
 
-- 
1.5.5.1


  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-05 13:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-05 13:41 [PATCH v2 0/8] exec: cleanup search_binary_handler() Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-05 13:41 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-08-05 13:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] exec: kill "int depth" in search_binary_handler() Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-05 13:41 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] exec: proc_exec_connector() should be called only once Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-05 13:41 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] exec: move allow_write_access/fput to exec_binprm() Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-05 13:41 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] exec: kill ->load_binary != NULL check in search_binary_handler() Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-05 13:41 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] exec: cleanup the CONFIG_MODULES logic Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-05 13:41 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] exec: don't retry if request_module() fails Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-05 13:41 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] exec: cleanup the error handling in search_binary_handler() Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130805134130.GA15622@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=zbr@ioremap.net \
    --cc=zml@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox