From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] tracing: final fixes for events and some
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 16:32:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130805143257.GA32639@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375712355.22073.45.camel@gandalf.local.home>
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> Linus,
>
> Oleg Nesterov has been working hard in closing all the holes that can
> lead to race conditions between deleting an event and accessing an event
> debugfs file. This included a fix to the debugfs system (acked by Greg
> Kroah-Hartman). We think that all the holes have been patched and
> hopefully we don't find more. I haven't marked all of them for stable
> because I need to examine them more to figure out how far back some of
> the changes need to go.
Sigh, that's quite some churn still - unless these bugs were introduced in
the v3.11 merge window (i.e. are genuine _regressions_), shouldn't such
invasive fixes really go into v3.12 instead?
I see that some of the fixes here fix issues that your earlier post-rc1
rounds of non-regression fixes introduced to begin with. That's really not
a good pattern either IMO.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-05 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-05 14:19 [GIT PULL] tracing: final fixes for events and some Steven Rostedt
2013-08-05 14:32 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-08-05 14:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-08-12 18:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-08-13 2:39 ` Dave Jones
2013-08-13 3:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-08-13 11:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-08-13 11:45 ` Dave Jones
2013-08-13 14:01 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130805143257.GA32639@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox