From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933193Ab3HGUeq (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Aug 2013 16:34:46 -0400 Received: from mail-gh0-f176.google.com ([209.85.160.176]:47803 "EHLO mail-gh0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932769Ab3HGUep (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Aug 2013 16:34:45 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 1092 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2013 16:34:45 EDT Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 17:34:37 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: David Ahern Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Ingo Molnar , Frederic Weisbecker , Peter Zijlstra , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Runzhen Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf kvm: option to print events that exceed a threshold Message-ID: <20130807203437.GJ2665@ghostprotocols.net> References: <1375753297-69645-1-git-send-email-dsahern@gmail.com> <1375753297-69645-5-git-send-email-dsahern@gmail.com> <20130807192725.GD2665@ghostprotocols.net> <5202ACF7.3020400@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5202ACF7.3020400@gmail.com> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 04:24:23PM -0400, David Ahern escreveu: > On 8/7/13 3:27 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > >Em Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 09:41:36PM -0400, David Ahern escreveu: > >So 'perf trace' has a similar option: > > > >[acme@zoo linux]$ perf trace --help > > > > --duration > > show only events with duration > N.M ms > > > > > >While you used: > > > >>+ OPT_U64('T', "threshold", &kvm->threshold, > >>+ "show events other than HALT that take longer than threshold usecs"), > > > >I prefer 'duration', and haven't assigned a single letter to it, they > >are scarce and we have shell long option completion, what do you think? > > > >The term was chosen, for 'perf trace' on the original patchset: > > > >http://lwn.net/Articles/415728/ > No preference really. I need to send out an update to the man page. > I can update this patch as well and re-send. Please. I applied all the other patches, just wait a bit before I run 'male -C tools/perf -f tests/make' on my perf/core before I push it out. - Arnaldo