From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758055Ab3HINBn (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Aug 2013 09:01:43 -0400 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:19418 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757313Ab3HINBl (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Aug 2013 09:01:41 -0400 Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 09:00:15 -0400 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk To: Raghavendra K T Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Gleb Natapov , mingo@redhat.com, jeremy@goop.org, x86@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, peterz@infradead.org, mtosatti@redhat.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, andi@firstfloor.org, attilio.rao@citrix.com, ouyang@cs.pitt.edu, gregkh@suse.de, agraf@suse.de, chegu_vinod@hp.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, avi.kivity@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, riel@redhat.com, drjones@redhat.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, srivatsa.vaddagiri@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH V12 0/14] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks Message-ID: <20130809130015.GA3730@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <20130806114020.20643.57235.sendpatchset@codeblue.in.ibm.com> <52016412.1020608@zytor.com> <5201B6FB.5080807@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <5201D180.9080005@zytor.com> <5201ED01.7000803@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130808005012.GI2810@phenom.dumpdata.com> <20130808010251.GJ15901@redhat.com> <52040A05.5080107@zytor.com> <520423E9.80507@zytor.com> <5204E57A.3000002@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5204E57A.3000002@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Source-IP: acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 06:20:02PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote: > On 08/09/2013 04:34 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > > >Okay, I figured it out. > > > >One of several problems with the formatting of this patchset is that it > >has one- and two-digit patch numbers in the headers, which meant that my > >scripts tried to apply patch 10 first. > > > > My bad. I 'll send out in uniform digit form next time. > If you use 'git format-patch --subject-prefix "PATCH V14" v3.11-rc4..' and 'git send-email --subject "[PATCH V14] bla blah" ..' that should be automatically taken care of?