From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S967879Ab3HIQAA (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 9 Aug 2013 12:00:00 -0400
Received: from mail-qa0-f41.google.com ([209.85.216.41]:40836 "EHLO
	mail-qa0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S934068Ab3HIP76 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 9 Aug 2013 11:59:58 -0400
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 11:59:49 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>, robert.moore@intel.com,
        lv.zheng@intel.com, lenb@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu,
        hpa@zytor.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, trenn@suse.de,
        yinghai@kernel.org, jiang.liu@huawei.com, wency@cn.fujitsu.com,
        laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com,
        izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com, mgorman@suse.de, minchan@kernel.org,
        mina86@mina86.com, gong.chen@linux.intel.com,
        vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com, lwoodman@redhat.com,
        riel@redhat.com, jweiner@redhat.com, prarit@redhat.com,
        zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com, yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH part2 0/4] acpi: Trivial fix and improving for memory
 hotplug.
Message-ID: <20130809155949.GN20515@mtj.dyndns.org>
References: <1375938239-18769-1-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
 <1851799.n4moZnvj4u@vostro.rjw.lan>
 <520439C9.3080601@cn.fujitsu.com>
 <1792540.pdAYjdHnnL@vostro.rjw.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1792540.pdAYjdHnnL@vostro.rjw.lan>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 03:36:16PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > No, it doesn't. And this patch-set can be merged first.
> 
> OK, so if nobody objects, I can take patches [1,3-4/4], but I don't think I'm
> the right maintainer to handle [2/4].

Given the dependencies, we'll probably need some coordination among
trees.  It spans across ACPI, memblock and x86.  Maybe the best way to
do it is applying the ACPI part to your tree, pulling the rest into a
tip branch and then put everything else there.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun