From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
aswin@hp.com, scott.norton@hp.com, chegu_vinod@hp.com, "Bui,
Tuan" <tuan.d.bui@hp.com>, Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>,
"Makphaibulchoke, Thavatchai" <thavatchai.makpahibulchoke@hp.com>,
"Bueso, Davidlohr" <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Give idle_balance() a break when it does not move tasks.
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 16:30:45 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130812110045.GA1925@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1376296970.1795.9.camel@j-VirtualBox>
> /*
> @@ -5298,6 +5300,8 @@ void idle_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq)
> continue;
>
> if (sd->flags & SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE) {
> + load_balance_attempted = true;
> +
> /* If we've pulled tasks over stop searching: */
> pulled_task = load_balance(this_cpu, this_rq,
> sd, CPU_NEWLY_IDLE, &balance);
> @@ -5322,6 +5326,10 @@ void idle_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq)
> */
> this_rq->next_balance = next_balance;
> }
> +
> + /* Give idle balance on this CPU a break when it isn't moving tasks */
> + if (load_balance_attempted && !pulled_task)
> + this_rq->next_newidle_balance = jiffies + (HZ / 100);
> }
Looks reasonable. However should we do this per sd and not per rq. i.e
move the next_newidle_balance to sched_domain. So if we find a
load_balance in newly_idle context that wasn't successful, we skip
load_balance for that sd in the next newly idle balance.
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-12 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-12 8:42 [PATCH] sched: Give idle_balance() a break when it does not move tasks Jason Low
2013-08-12 11:00 ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2013-08-12 20:19 ` Jason Low
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130812110045.GA1925@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Waiman.Long@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
--cc=davidlohr.bueso@hp.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thavatchai.makpahibulchoke@hp.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tuan.d.bui@hp.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).