From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
edumazet@google.com, darren@dvhart.com, sbw@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC nohz_full 6/7] nohz_full: Add full-system-idle state machine
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 20:07:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130814030723.GT29406@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130809162057.GC13339@somewhere>
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 06:20:59PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 04:19:23PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> > index 3edae39..ff84bed 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> > +++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> > @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
> > #include <linux/gfp.h>
> > #include <linux/oom.h>
> > #include <linux/smpboot.h>
> > -#include <linux/tick.h>
> > +#include "time/tick-internal.h"
> >
> > #define RCU_KTHREAD_PRIO 1
> >
> > @@ -2395,12 +2395,12 @@ static void rcu_kick_nohz_cpu(int cpu)
> > * most active flavor of RCU.
> > */
> > #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
> > -static struct rcu_state __maybe_unused *rcu_sysidle_state = &rcu_preempt_state;
> > +static struct rcu_state *rcu_sysidle_state = &rcu_preempt_state;
> > #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
> > -static struct rcu_state __maybe_unused *rcu_sysidle_state = &rcu_sched_state;
> > +static struct rcu_state *rcu_sysidle_state = &rcu_sched_state;
> > #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
>
> Ah you fixed it here. Ok :)
Bisectability and all that. ;-)
> > -static int __maybe_unused full_sysidle_state; /* Current system-idle state. */
> > +static int full_sysidle_state; /* Current system-idle state. */
> > #define RCU_SYSIDLE_NOT 0 /* Some CPU is not idle. */
> > #define RCU_SYSIDLE_SHORT 1 /* All CPUs idle for brief period. */
> > #define RCU_SYSIDLE_LONG 2 /* All CPUs idle for long enough. */
> [...]
> > +/*
> > + * Check to see if the system is fully idle, other than the timekeeping CPU.
> > + * The caller must have disabled interrupts.
> > + */
> > +bool rcu_sys_is_idle(void)
> > +{
> > + static struct rcu_sysidle_head rsh;
> > + int rss = ACCESS_ONCE(full_sysidle_state);
> > +
> > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(smp_processor_id() != tick_do_timer_cpu))
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + /* Handle small-system case by doing a full scan of CPUs. */
> > + if (nr_cpu_ids <= RCU_SYSIDLE_SMALL) {
>
> I don't understand how the nr_cpu_ids > RCU_SYSIDLE_SMALL is handled. There don't
> seem to be other calls of rcu_sysidle_check_cpu() than for small systems.
The other calls are from kernel/rcutree.c from the force-quiescent-state
code. If we have a big system, we don't check until we have some other
reason to touch the cache lines. If we have a small system, we just
dig through them on transition to idle.
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-14 3:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-26 23:18 [PATCH RFC nohz_full 0/7] v4 Provide infrastructure for full-system idle Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-26 23:19 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full 1/7] nohz_full: Add Kconfig parameter for scalable detection of all-idle state Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-26 23:19 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full 2/7] nohz_full: Add rcu_dyntick data " Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-05 1:26 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-07-26 23:19 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full 3/7] nohz_full: Add per-CPU idle-state tracking Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-09 15:37 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-07-26 23:19 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full 4/7] nohz_full: Add full-system idle states and variables Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-09 15:44 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-07-26 23:19 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full 5/7] nohz_full: Add full-system-idle arguments to API Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-26 23:19 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full 6/7] nohz_full: Add full-system-idle state machine Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-29 8:19 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-07-29 17:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-09 16:20 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-14 3:07 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2013-07-26 23:19 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full 7/7] nohz_full: Force RCU's grace-period kthreads onto timekeeping CPU Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-29 3:36 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-07-29 16:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-29 16:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-07-29 17:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-30 1:40 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-07-30 17:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-29 3:35 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full 1/7] nohz_full: Add Kconfig parameter for scalable detection of all-idle state Lai Jiangshan
2013-07-29 15:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-05 1:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-17 23:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-07-09 1:29 [PATCH RFC nohz_full 0/7] v3 Provide infrastructure for full-system idle Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-09 1:30 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full 1/7] nohz_full: Add Kconfig parameter for scalable detection of all-idle state Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-09 1:30 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full 6/7] nohz_full: Add full-system-idle state machine Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-17 23:31 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-07-18 0:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-18 1:33 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-07-18 3:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-18 14:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-07-18 16:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-18 22:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-07-19 0:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-19 2:12 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-07-19 5:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-24 18:09 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-07-24 22:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-24 23:26 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-07-26 22:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-27 18:13 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130814030723.GT29406@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sbw@mit.edu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).