From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Jaromir Capik <jcapik@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ania Honess <ahoness@redhat.com>,
atomlin@redhat.com, asolanas@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: proc/stat: idle goes backward
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:47:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130816144704.GA25904@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1277145964.2082352.1376490809716.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
Hello.
Out customer reports that "idle" field is not monotonic. So far this
is all I know. I do not know how to reproduce, etc.
But when I look at this code, this looks really possible even
ignoring drivers/cpuidle/ which plays with update_ts_time_stats().
So, get_cpu_idle_time_us(last_update_time => NULL) does:
if (ts->idle_active && !nr_iowait_cpu(cpu)) {
ktime_t delta = ktime_sub(now, ts->idle_entrytime);
idle = ktime_add(ts->idle_sleeptime, delta);
} else {
idle = ts->idle_sleeptime;
}
Suppose that ts->idle_active == T. By the time we calculate
idle = ktime_add(ts->idle_sleeptime, delta);
this cpu can be already non-idle and ->idle_sleeptime can be already
updated by tick_nohz_stop_idle(), we return the wrong value.
If user-space reads /proc/stat again after that, "idle" can obviously
go back.
get_cpu_iowait_time_us() has the same problem.
Plus nr_iowait_cpu() can change in between even if cpu stays idle,
io_schedule() can return on another CPU.
Questions:
- Any other reason why it can be non-monotonic?
- Should we fix this or should we document that userspace
should handle this itself?
IOW, is this is bug or not?
Oleg.
next parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-16 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <v5wUE000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000MRITO500uRRuI-89T-iqXCkOVGWF4w@sfdc.net>
[not found] ` <1904614521.2884383.1376487067689.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <1277145964.2082352.1376490809716.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
2013-08-16 14:47 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-08-16 15:01 ` proc/stat: idle goes backward Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-16 15:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-16 15:30 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130816144704.GA25904@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=ahoness@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=asolanas@redhat.com \
--cc=atomlin@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jcapik@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox