From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, sbw@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/9] nohz_full: Add full-system idle states and variables
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 18:39:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130819013924.GA29406@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130818030920.GI28923@leaf>
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 08:09:21PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 06:49:41PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > This commit adds control variables and states for full-system idle.
> > The system will progress through the states in numerical order when
> > the system is fully idle (other than the timekeeping CPU), and reset
> > down to the initial state if any non-timekeeping CPU goes non-idle.
> > The current state is kept in full_sysidle_state.
> >
> > A RCU_SYSIDLE_SMALL macro is defined, and systems with this number
> > of CPUs or fewer move through the states more aggressively. The idea
> > is that the resulting memory contention is less of a problem on small
> > systems. Architectures can adjust this value (which defaults to 8)
> > using CONFIG_ARCH_RCU_SYSIDLE_SMALL.
> >
> > One flavor of RCU will be in charge of driving the state machine,
> > defined by rcu_sysidle_state. This should be the busiest flavor of RCU.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>
> One issue (and one question) below; with the issue addressed,
> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
>
> > kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> > index eab81da..64a05b9f 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> > +++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> > @@ -2378,6 +2378,34 @@ static void rcu_kick_nohz_cpu(int cpu)
> > #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE
> >
> > /*
> > + * Handle small systems specially, accelerating their transition into
> > + * full idle state. Allow arches to override this code's idea of
> > + * what constitutes a "small" system.
> > + */
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_RCU_SYSIDLE_SMALL
>
> I don't see any Kconfig creating this new config option.
>
> Also, why not simply define this config option unconditionally, with a
> default of 8, and then use its value directly?
Good point, removing this and adding a Kconfig option in the
"nohz_full: Add full-system-idle state machine" commit, with a
default value of 8. Architecture maintainers who want something
different can then set that up in their defconfig files.
> > +static int __maybe_unused full_sysidle_state; /* Current system-idle state. */
> > +#define RCU_SYSIDLE_NOT 0 /* Some CPU is not idle. */
> > +#define RCU_SYSIDLE_SHORT 1 /* All CPUs idle for brief period. */
> > +#define RCU_SYSIDLE_LONG 2 /* All CPUs idle for long enough. */
> > +#define RCU_SYSIDLE_FULL 3 /* All CPUs idle, ready for sysidle. */
> > +#define RCU_SYSIDLE_FULL_NOTED 4 /* Actually entered sysidle state. */
>
> Perhaps there's a kernel style rule I'm not thinking of that makes it
> verboten, but: why not use an enum for a state variable like this?
I didn't trust enum interactions with xchg and cmpxchg, so opted for "int"
instead. That said, enum is much more portable than when I last looked
at it. Admittedly, the last time I looked at it was in the early 1980s...
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-19 1:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-18 1:49 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/9] sysidle changes for v3.12 Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-18 1:49 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/9] rcu: Eliminate unused APIs intended for adaptive ticks Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-18 1:49 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/9] nohz_full: Add testing information to documentation Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-18 1:49 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/9] nohz_full: Add Kconfig parameter for scalable detection of all-idle state Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-18 1:49 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/9] nohz_full: Add rcu_dyntick data " Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-18 3:02 ` Josh Triplett
2013-08-19 1:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-19 1:34 ` Josh Triplett
2013-08-18 1:49 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 5/9] nohz_full: Add per-CPU idle-state tracking Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-18 3:04 ` Josh Triplett
2013-08-18 1:49 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/9] nohz_full: Add full-system idle states and variables Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-18 3:09 ` Josh Triplett
2013-08-19 1:39 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2013-08-19 2:49 ` Josh Triplett
2013-08-19 3:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-18 1:49 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 7/9] nohz_full: Add full-system-idle arguments to API Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-18 3:11 ` Josh Triplett
2013-08-19 1:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-18 1:49 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 8/9] nohz_full: Add full-system-idle state machine Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-18 1:49 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 9/9] nohz_full: Force RCU's grace-period kthreads onto timekeeping CPU Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-18 3:13 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/9] sysidle changes for v3.12 Josh Triplett
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-08-20 2:47 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/9] v2 sysidle changes for 3.12 Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-20 2:47 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/9] rcu: Eliminate unused APIs intended for adaptive ticks Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-20 2:47 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/9] nohz_full: Add full-system idle states and variables Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130819013924.GA29406@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sbw@mit.edu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).