From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
hpa@zytor.com, gaolong@kylinos.com.cn,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, peterz@infradead.org,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [tip:sched/core] sched: Fix the theoretical signal_wake_up() vs. schedule() race
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 09:13:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130819071340.GB26184@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130817150509.GA26817@redhat.com>
* Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 08/16, tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > Commit-ID: e4c711cfd32f3c74a699af3121a3b0ff631328a7
> > Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/e4c711cfd32f3c74a699af3121a3b0ff631328a7
> > Author: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> > AuthorDate: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 16:33:25 +0200
> > Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> > CommitDate: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 17:44:54 +0200
> >
> > sched: Fix the theoretical signal_wake_up() vs. schedule() race
>
> Ingo, thanks.
>
> But fyi, this is already merged as e0acd0a6 in Linus's tree.
Missed that - I zapped this commit from the tip of
sched/core, thanks Oleg!
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-19 7:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <tencent_26310211398C21034BD3B2F9@qq.com>
2013-08-08 18:19 ` Patch for lost wakeups Linus Torvalds
2013-08-08 19:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-08 19:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-08-09 13:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-09 18:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-08-11 17:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-11 17:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
[not found] ` <tencent_293B72F26D71A4191C7C999A@qq.com>
2013-08-11 17:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-11 23:52 ` James Bottomley
2013-08-12 17:02 ` [PATCH] sched: fix the theoretical signal_wake_up() vs schedule() race Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-13 7:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-13 14:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-16 18:46 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Fix the theoretical signal_wake_up() vs. " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-17 15:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-19 7:13 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-08-09 15:18 ` [PATCH 0/1] dlm: kill the unnecessary and wrong device_close()->recalc_sigpending() Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-09 15:19 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-12 20:26 ` David Teigland
2013-08-09 13:28 ` Patch for lost wakeups Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-09 15:31 ` block_all_signals() must die (Was: Patch for lost wakeups) Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130819071340.GB26184@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gaolong@kylinos.com.cn \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).