From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751108Ab3HSPRp (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:17:45 -0400 Received: from mail-yh0-f53.google.com ([209.85.213.53]:50066 "EHLO mail-yh0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750793Ab3HSPRo (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:17:44 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 12:17:34 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Namhyung Kim Cc: Pekka Enberg , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] perf ui/gtk: Separate out GTK code to a shared object (v4) Message-ID: <20130819151734.GB3053@ghostprotocols.net> References: <1376029689-32593-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> <20130819140500.GA3053@ghostprotocols.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130819140500.GA3053@ghostprotocols.net> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:05:00AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > But I expected that after the first patch 'perf --gtk' would work, and > it doesn't. > > Now even after I applied the whole series I don't get --gtk to work, > neither as a non-root nor as root :-\ > > Investigating... Somehow I expected ~/lib64/ was in the ld library path, it was not, duh, after I added it, and applied all three patches, it works as expected, so can we: 1. combine the three patches into just one so that we keep the 'perf report --gtk' bisectable? 2. add a patch to warn the user when '--gtk' is specified but no libperf-gtk.so file is found in the loader library path? - Arnaldo