From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <fernando_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/4] nohz: Fix racy sleeptime stats
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 20:15:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130820181500.GA22287@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1376667753-29014-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
While at it.
I do not also understand the cpu_online() checks in fs/proc/stat.c.
OK, I agree, if cpu is offline it should not participate in cpu
summary. But if it goes offline, why it should switch from
->iowait_sleeptime + cpustat[CPUTIME_IDLE] as it seen by /proc/stat?
This can be another source of "idle goes backward", no?
IOW. Ignoring the other problems we have, perhaps something like
below makes sense?
Oleg.
--- x/fs/proc/stat.c
+++ x/fs/proc/stat.c
@@ -45,10 +45,9 @@ static cputime64_t get_iowait_time(int c
static u64 get_idle_time(int cpu)
{
- u64 idle, idle_time = -1ULL;
+ u64 idle, idle_time;
- if (cpu_online(cpu))
- idle_time = get_cpu_idle_time_us(cpu, NULL);
+ idle_time = get_cpu_idle_time_us(cpu, NULL);
if (idle_time == -1ULL)
/* !NO_HZ or cpu offline so we can rely on cpustat.idle */
@@ -61,10 +60,9 @@ static u64 get_idle_time(int cpu)
static u64 get_iowait_time(int cpu)
{
- u64 iowait, iowait_time = -1ULL;
+ u64 iowait, iowait_time;
- if (cpu_online(cpu))
- iowait_time = get_cpu_iowait_time_us(cpu, NULL);
+ iowait_time = get_cpu_iowait_time_us(cpu, NULL);
if (iowait_time == -1ULL)
/* !NO_HZ or cpu offline so we can rely on cpustat.iowait */
--- x/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ x/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ u64 get_cpu_idle_time_us(int cpu, u64 *l
update_ts_time_stats(cpu, ts, now, last_update_time);
idle = ts->idle_sleeptime;
} else {
- if (ts->idle_active && !nr_iowait_cpu(cpu)) {
+ if (ts->idle_active && cpu_online(cpu) && !nr_iowait_cpu(cpu)) {
ktime_t delta = ktime_sub(now, ts->idle_entrytime);
idle = ktime_add(ts->idle_sleeptime, delta);
@@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ u64 get_cpu_iowait_time_us(int cpu, u64
update_ts_time_stats(cpu, ts, now, last_update_time);
iowait = ts->iowait_sleeptime;
} else {
- if (ts->idle_active && nr_iowait_cpu(cpu) > 0) {
+ if (ts->idle_active && cpu_online(cpu) && nr_iowait_cpu(cpu)) {
ktime_t delta = ktime_sub(now, ts->idle_entrytime);
iowait = ktime_add(ts->iowait_sleeptime, delta);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-20 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-16 15:42 [PATCH RESEND 0/4] nohz: Fix racy sleeptime stats Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-16 15:42 ` [PATCH 1/4] nohz: Only update sleeptime stats locally Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-18 16:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-18 21:38 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-18 17:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-19 18:05 ` Stratos Karafotis
2013-08-16 15:42 ` [PATCH 2/4] nohz: Synchronize sleep time stats with seqlock Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-16 16:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-16 16:20 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-16 16:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-16 16:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-16 16:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-16 17:12 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-18 16:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-18 21:25 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-19 10:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-19 15:44 ` Arjan van de Ven
2013-08-19 15:47 ` Arjan van de Ven
2013-08-19 11:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-19 11:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-20 6:59 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2013-08-20 8:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-20 15:29 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-20 15:33 ` Arjan van de Ven
2013-08-20 15:35 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-20 15:41 ` Arjan van de Ven
2013-08-20 15:31 ` Arjan van de Ven
2013-08-20 16:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-20 16:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-20 17:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-20 18:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-21 8:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-21 11:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-21 12:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-21 14:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-21 16:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-01 14:05 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-10-01 14:26 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-10-01 14:27 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-10-01 14:49 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-10-01 15:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-01 15:21 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-10-01 15:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-01 16:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-10-01 16:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-02 12:45 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-10-02 12:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-02 14:35 ` Arjan van de Ven
2013-10-02 16:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-21 12:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-21 17:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-21 18:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-21 18:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-20 22:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-21 11:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-20 6:21 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2013-08-20 21:55 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-16 16:32 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-16 16:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-16 16:49 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-16 16:37 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-18 16:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-18 21:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-16 15:42 ` [PATCH 3/4] nohz: Consolidate sleep time stats read code Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-18 17:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-18 21:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-16 15:42 ` [PATCH 4/4] nohz: Convert a few places to use local per cpu accesses Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-16 16:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-16 16:12 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-16 16:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-16 16:34 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-20 18:15 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-08-21 8:28 ` [PATCH RESEND 0/4] nohz: Fix racy sleeptime stats Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-21 11:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130820181500.GA22287@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fernando_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).