From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751995Ab3HUOTa (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:19:30 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com ([209.85.217.181]:38205 "EHLO mail-lb0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751944Ab3HUOT3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:19:29 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 18:19:26 +0400 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: David Vrabel , Andy Lutomirski , Pavel Emelyanov , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Xen-devel@lists.xen.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linus Torvalds , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Boris Ostrovsky , Jan Beulich Subject: Re: Regression: x86/mm: new _PTE_SWP_SOFT_DIRTY bit conflicts with existing use Message-ID: <20130821141926.GT18673@moon> References: <5214C524.1050900@citrix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 04:11:25PM +0200, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > Eep. This should be reverted, indeed. This isn't a manifest bug on !Xen but we > have gotten requests for WT support which would mean adding in the PAT but again. Please no, letme fix it. That's what I'm having in mind: don't use pse bit in swap entry but always mark page read from swap as dirty one (it's better than having no tracker at all and will be the case on old machines with 32bit ptes only).