From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752059Ab3HUO37 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:29:59 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:32805 "EHLO mail-la0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751410Ab3HUO35 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:29:57 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 18:29:55 +0400 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: David Vrabel , Andy Lutomirski , Pavel Emelyanov , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Xen-devel@lists.xen.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linus Torvalds , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Boris Ostrovsky , Jan Beulich Subject: Re: Regression: x86/mm: new _PTE_SWP_SOFT_DIRTY bit conflicts with existing use Message-ID: <20130821142955.GU18673@moon> References: <5214C524.1050900@citrix.com> <20130821141926.GT18673@moon> <4455be44-7daf-41f0-add6-087cf992868f@email.android.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4455be44-7daf-41f0-add6-087cf992868f@email.android.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 04:22:21PM +0200, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > OK now I'm confused. I guess I shouldn't comment while on vacation > and cache cold on everything. I rather think I'm missing something, that's why I asked David how this featue affects non present pte.