From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
Cc: swarren@wwwdotorg.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
ian.campbell@citrix.com, grant.likely@linaro.org,
rob.herring@calxeda.com, rui.zhang@intel.com, wni@nvidia.com,
durgadoss.r@intel.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/14] hwmon: lm75: expose to thermal fw via DT nodes
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:39:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130823233936.GA14810@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1377299755-5134-4-git-send-email-eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 07:15:44PM -0400, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> This patch adds to lm75 temperature sensor the possibility
> to expose itself as thermal zone device, registered on the
> thermal framework.
>
> The thermal zone is built only if a device tree node
> describing a thermal zone for this sensor is present
> inside the lm75 DT node. Otherwise, the driver behavior
> will be the same.
>
> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> Cc: lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/hwmon/lm75.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
> index c03b490..dc55908 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
> #include <linux/hwmon-sysfs.h>
> #include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/thermal.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> #include "lm75.h"
>
>
> @@ -70,6 +72,7 @@ static const u8 LM75_REG_TEMP[3] = {
> /* Each client has this additional data */
> struct lm75_data {
> struct device *hwmon_dev;
> + struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
> struct mutex update_lock;
> u8 orig_conf;
> u8 resolution; /* In bits, between 9 and 12 */
> @@ -92,6 +95,19 @@ static struct lm75_data *lm75_update_device(struct device *dev);
>
> /* sysfs attributes for hwmon */
>
> +static int lm75_read_temp(void *dev, unsigned long *temp)
> +{
> + struct lm75_data *data = lm75_update_device(dev);
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(data))
> + return PTR_ERR(data);
> +
> + *temp = ((data->temp[0] >> (16 - data->resolution)) * 1000) >>
> + (data->resolution - 8);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static ssize_t show_temp(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *da,
> char *buf)
> {
> @@ -271,11 +287,25 @@ lm75_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> goto exit_remove;
> }
>
> + if (of_find_property(client->dev.of_node, "monitored-zones", NULL)) {
> + data->tz = thermal_zone_of_device_register(&client->dev,
> + 0,
> + false, /* -hwmon */
> + &client->dev,
> + lm75_read_temp);
> + if (IS_ERR(data->tz)) {
> + status = PTR_ERR(data->tz);
> + goto exit_hwmon;
> + }
> + }
> +
I don't think it should be fatal if thermal_zone_of_device_register fails.
hwmon itself still works fine, and should not be penaltized for a thermal
subsystem failure. Better display a warning if that happens and don't bail out.
The same comment applies to all patches affecting the hwmon subsystem.
> dev_info(&client->dev, "%s: sensor '%s'\n",
> dev_name(data->hwmon_dev), client->name);
>
> return 0;
>
> +exit_hwmon:
> + hwmon_device_unregister(data->hwmon_dev);
> exit_remove:
> sysfs_remove_group(&client->dev.kobj, &lm75_group);
> return status;
> @@ -285,6 +315,7 @@ static int lm75_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> {
> struct lm75_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>
> + thermal_zone_device_unregister(data->tz);
> hwmon_device_unregister(data->hwmon_dev);
> sysfs_remove_group(&client->dev.kobj, &lm75_group);
> lm75_write_value(client, LM75_REG_CONF, data->orig_conf);
> --
> 1.8.2.1.342.gfa7285d
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-23 23:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-23 23:15 [RFC PATCH 00/14] RFCv2: device thermal limits represented in device tree nodes Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 01/14] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: add dt node parsing for 'cooling-zones' Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-26 4:42 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-08-26 12:13 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-27 9:29 ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-27 13:05 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-27 10:22 ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-27 13:44 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-27 16:23 ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-27 18:17 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-29 23:19 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-09-02 8:14 ` Wei Ni
2013-09-02 16:28 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-09-03 13:15 ` Mark Rutland
2013-09-03 17:12 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-09-07 0:19 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 03/14] hwmon: lm75: expose to thermal fw via DT nodes Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:39 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2013-08-26 12:11 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:50 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-26 12:15 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-27 10:26 ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 04/14] hwmon: tmp102: " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-27 10:27 ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 05/14] thermal: ti-soc-thermal: use thermal DT infrastructure Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 06/14] arm: dts: add omap4 CPU thermal data Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 07/14] arm: dts: add omap4430 " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 08/14] arm: dts: add omap4460 " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 09/14] arm: dts: point to cooling-zones on omap4430 cpu node Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 10/14] arm: dts: point to cooling-zones on omap4460 " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 11/14] arm: dts: add omap5 GPU thermal data Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 12/14] arm: dts: add omap5 CORE " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 13/14] arm: dts: add omap5 " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 14/14] arm: dts: point to cooling-zones on omap5 cpu node Eduardo Valentin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130823233936.GA14810@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=durgadoss.r@intel.com \
--cc=eduardo.valentin@ti.com \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=wni@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox