From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: oleg@redhat.com, eparis@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
rgb@redhat.com
Subject: [RFC] audit: avoid soft lockup in audit_log_start()
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 18:21:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130828182114.6b67ea90@redhat.com> (raw)
I'm getting the following soft lockup:
CPU: 6 PID: 2278 Comm: killall5 Tainted: GF 3.11.0-rc7+ #1
Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
0000000000000099 ffff88011fd83de8 ffffffff815324df 0000000000002800
ffffffff817d48f9 ffff88011fd83e68 ffffffff8152e669 ffff88011fd83e68
ffffffff00000008 ffff88011fd83e78 ffff88011fd83e18 0000004081dac040
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff815324df>] dump_stack+0x46/0x58
[<ffffffff8152e669>] panic+0xbb/0x1c4
[<ffffffff810d03c3>] watchdog_timer_fn+0x163/0x170
[<ffffffff8106c691>] __run_hrtimer+0x81/0x1c0
[<ffffffff810d0260>] ? watchdog+0x30/0x30
[<ffffffff8106cea7>] hrtimer_interrupt+0x107/0x240
[<ffffffff8102f61b>] local_apic_timer_interrupt+0x3b/0x60
[<ffffffff81542465>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x45/0x60
[<ffffffff8154124a>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x6a/0x70
<EOI> [<ffffffff810c2f5f>] ? audit_log_start+0xbf/0x430
[<ffffffff810c2fe7>] ? audit_log_start+0x147/0x430
[<ffffffff81079030>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x2a0/0x2a0
[<ffffffff810c86be>] audit_log_exit+0x6ae/0xc30
[<ffffffff81188662>] ? __alloc_fd+0x42/0x100
[<ffffffff810c98e7>] __audit_syscall_exit+0x257/0x2b0
[<ffffffff81540794>] sysret_audit+0x17/0x21
The reproducer is somewhat unusual:
1. Install RHEL6.5 (maybe a similar older user-space will do)
2. Boot the just installed system
3. In this first boot you'll meet the firstboot script, which
will do some setup and (depending on your answers) it will
reboot the machine
4. During that first reboot the system hangs while terminating
all processes:
Sending all processes the TERM signal...
It's when the soft lockup above happens. And yes, I managed
to get this with latest upstream kernel (HEAD fa8218def1b1)
I'm reproducing it on a VM, but the first report was on bare-metal.
This is what is happening:
1. audit_log_start() is called
2. As we have SKBs waiting in audit_skb_queue and all conditions
evaluate to true, we sleep in wait_for_auditd()
3. Go to 2, until sleep_time gets negative and audit_log_start()
just busy-waits
Now, *why* this is happening is a mistery to me. I tried debugging
it, but all I could find is that at some point the kauditd thread
never wakes up after having called schedule(). I even tried waking
it up before calling wait_for_auditd(), but it didn't.
This patch is a RFC because it doesn't actually fix anything. It
just bails out before we busy-wait. Which is better than nothing,
but the system will still give a long pause when terminating all
processes. Besides, we risk papering over the real bug...
Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
---
kernel/audit.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
index 91e53d0..33e9c4c 100644
--- a/kernel/audit.c
+++ b/kernel/audit.c
@@ -1097,6 +1097,7 @@ struct audit_buffer *audit_log_start(struct audit_context *ctx, gfp_t gfp_mask,
unsigned int uninitialized_var(serial);
int reserve;
unsigned long timeout_start = jiffies;
+ unsigned long sleep_time;
if (audit_initialized != AUDIT_INITIALIZED)
return NULL;
@@ -1112,13 +1113,11 @@ struct audit_buffer *audit_log_start(struct audit_context *ctx, gfp_t gfp_mask,
while (audit_backlog_limit
&& skb_queue_len(&audit_skb_queue) > audit_backlog_limit + reserve) {
- if (gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT && audit_backlog_wait_time) {
- unsigned long sleep_time;
-
sleep_time = timeout_start + audit_backlog_wait_time -
jiffies;
- if ((long)sleep_time > 0)
- wait_for_auditd(sleep_time);
+ if (gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT && audit_backlog_wait_time
+ && sleep_time > 0) {
+ wait_for_auditd(sleep_time);
continue;
}
if (audit_rate_check() && printk_ratelimit())
--
1.8.1.4
next reply other threads:[~2013-08-28 22:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-28 22:21 Luiz Capitulino [this message]
2013-08-28 22:33 ` [RFC] audit: avoid soft lockup in audit_log_start() Andrew Morton
2013-08-28 22:54 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-08-28 23:08 ` Andrew Morton
2013-08-29 0:49 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-08-30 18:23 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-09-09 14:32 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2013-09-09 14:54 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-09-09 15:19 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2013-09-09 15:29 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-09-09 15:42 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2013-09-10 16:03 ` Eric Paris
2013-09-10 17:45 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-09-17 22:28 ` Andrew Morton
2013-09-17 22:54 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-09-18 1:57 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 9:48 ` [PATCH] audit: fix endless wait " Konstantin Khlebnikov
2013-09-18 13:31 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 19:06 ` [PATCH 0/8] Audit backlog queue fixes related to soft lockup Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 19:06 ` [PATCH 1/8] audit: avoid soft lockup due to audit_log_start() incorrect loop termination Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 19:06 ` [PATCH 2/8] audit: reset audit backlog wait time after error recovery Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 19:06 ` [PATCH 3/8] audit: make use of remaining sleep time from wait_for_auditd Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 19:06 ` [PATCH 4/8] audit: efficiency fix 1: only wake up if queue shorter than backlog limit Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 19:06 ` [PATCH 5/8] audit: efficiency fix 2: request exclusive wait since all need same resource Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 19:06 ` [PATCH 6/8] audit: add boot option to override default backlog limit Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 19:06 ` [PATCH 7/8] audit: clean up AUDIT_GET/SET local variables and future-proof API Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-19 21:18 ` Steve Grubb
2013-09-20 14:47 ` Eric Paris
2013-09-23 16:38 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 19:06 ` [PATCH 8/8] audit: add audit_backlog_wait_time configuration option Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 20:33 ` Eric Paris
2013-09-18 20:49 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 20:54 ` Eric Paris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130828182114.6b67ea90@redhat.com \
--to=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox