public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, eparis@redhat.com,
	rgb@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] audit: avoid soft lockup in audit_log_start()
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 14:23:26 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130830142326.79864486@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130828160813.e448eee90886310d6640b87d@linux-foundation.org>

On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 16:08:13 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 18:54:36 -0400 Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > > Are you really sure that kauditd is stuck in schedule() and doesn't
> > > come out?
> > 
> > No, that's a guess. Inferred from:
> > 
> > 1. I tried calling wake_up_interruptible(&kauditd_wait); right
> >    before wait_for_auditd(). Nothing changes
> > 
> > 2. I added this debug printks:
> > 
> >   diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
> >   index 91e53d0..27448ad 100644
> >   --- a/kernel/audit.c
> >   +++ b/kernel/audit.c
> >   @@ -458,11 +458,14 @@ static int kauditd_thread(void *dummy)
> >    		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> >    		add_wait_queue(&kauditd_wait, &wait);
> >    
> >   +		pr_emerg_ratelimited("*** sleeping\n");
> >   +
> >    		if (!skb_queue_len(&audit_skb_queue)) {
> >    			try_to_freeze();
> >    			schedule();
> >    		}
> >    
> >   +		pr_emerg_ratelimited("*** waking up\n");
> >    		__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> >    		remove_wait_queue(&kauditd_wait, &wait);
> >    	}
> > 
> >  I get several pairs of sleeping/waking up strings right before the
> >  system begins to shut down. Then it stops (even though we do
> >  have SKBs queued)
> 
> Well.  I assume "*** sleeping" the last thing kauditd prints?  If the
> last print is "waking up" then obviously kauditd is stuck somewhere
> else, which makes more sense.

That's correct. According to crash, here's where it's stuck:

 #0 [ffff880115511c58] __schedule at ffffffff815361de
 #1 [ffff880115511cd0] schedule at ffffffff81537039
 #2 [ffff880115511ce0] schedule_timeout at ffffffff81534524
 #3 [ffff880115511d90] netlink_attachskb at ffffffff81498c69
 #4 [ffff880115511df0] netlink_unicast at ffffffff81498d7f
 #5 [ffff880115511e40] kauditd_send_skb at ffffffff810c254f
 #6 [ffff880115511e60] kauditd_thread at ffffffff810c26e9
 #7 [ffff880115511ec0] kthread at ffffffff810693b0
 #8 [ffff880115511f50] ret_from_fork at ffffffff8154071c

I see two possible reasons for this:

 1. User-space triggered a NETLINK_CONGESTED condition. If this is
    the problem, then the fix is to make audit's netlink socket
    non-blocking and queue SKBs if netlink_unicast() returns -EINVAL

 2. It's a race condition in the audit code. This bug is only triggered
    on SMP machines _and_ adding printk()s to kauditd_thread() makes
    it go away. Also, if I'm not mistaken, there's a number of global
    variables that are shared between kaudit_thread() and threads
    calling audit_log(). For example: kaudit_sock, audit_skb_hold_queue,
	kauditd_wait and others

I can try protecting the global data structures with a mutex but, will
such a patch be accepted if the bug goes away? :)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-08-30 18:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-28 22:21 [RFC] audit: avoid soft lockup in audit_log_start() Luiz Capitulino
2013-08-28 22:33 ` Andrew Morton
2013-08-28 22:54   ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-08-28 23:08     ` Andrew Morton
2013-08-29  0:49       ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-08-30 18:23       ` Luiz Capitulino [this message]
2013-09-09 14:32 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2013-09-09 14:54   ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-09-09 15:19     ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2013-09-09 15:29       ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-09-09 15:42         ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2013-09-10 16:03   ` Eric Paris
2013-09-10 17:45     ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-09-17 22:28     ` Andrew Morton
2013-09-17 22:54       ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-09-18  1:57       ` Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18  9:48       ` [PATCH] audit: fix endless wait " Konstantin Khlebnikov
2013-09-18 13:31         ` Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 19:06       ` [PATCH 0/8] Audit backlog queue fixes related to soft lockup Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 19:06         ` [PATCH 1/8] audit: avoid soft lockup due to audit_log_start() incorrect loop termination Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 19:06         ` [PATCH 2/8] audit: reset audit backlog wait time after error recovery Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 19:06         ` [PATCH 3/8] audit: make use of remaining sleep time from wait_for_auditd Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 19:06         ` [PATCH 4/8] audit: efficiency fix 1: only wake up if queue shorter than backlog limit Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 19:06         ` [PATCH 5/8] audit: efficiency fix 2: request exclusive wait since all need same resource Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 19:06         ` [PATCH 6/8] audit: add boot option to override default backlog limit Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 19:06         ` [PATCH 7/8] audit: clean up AUDIT_GET/SET local variables and future-proof API Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-19 21:18           ` Steve Grubb
2013-09-20 14:47             ` Eric Paris
2013-09-23 16:38               ` Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 19:06         ` [PATCH 8/8] audit: add audit_backlog_wait_time configuration option Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 20:33           ` Eric Paris
2013-09-18 20:49             ` Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 20:54               ` Eric Paris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130830142326.79864486@redhat.com \
    --to=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=rgb@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox