From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 13/18 v2] ftrace: Disable the RCU unsafe checker when irqsoff is enabled
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 12:58:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130831195827.GS3871@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130831051702.596618450@goodmis.org>
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 01:11:30AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>
> The irqsoff tracer can be called during some of the RCU unsafe
> regions. The proble is that some of the internal calls that it
s/proble/problem/
> makes may also be traced. For example, it uses spin locks. But if
> the spin lock gets traced and the RCU unsafe checker runs, it will
> trigger that RCU is not safe to use. But the only reason a spin lock
> is being used in an RCU unsafe region is because the irqsoff trace
> uses it, and causes a false positive.
>
> Disable the unsafe RCU checker when irqsoff is enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Looks like a good compromise, as did the previous one involving the
function graph tracer. Again, though, should we do something to
indicate that RCU safety checks have been disabled?
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c b/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c
> index 2aefbee..62d603c 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c
> @@ -584,9 +584,14 @@ static int start_irqsoff_tracer(struct trace_array *tr, int graph)
>
> ret = register_irqsoff_function(graph, 0);
>
> - if (!ret && tracing_is_enabled())
> + if (!ret && tracing_is_enabled()) {
> + /*
> + * irqsoff tracer can cause unsafe rcu checker
> + * to have false positives.
> + */
> + ftrace_unsafe_rcu_checker_disable();
> tracer_enabled = 1;
> - else
> + } else
> tracer_enabled = 0;
>
> return ret;
> @@ -594,6 +599,9 @@ static int start_irqsoff_tracer(struct trace_array *tr, int graph)
>
> static void stop_irqsoff_tracer(struct trace_array *tr, int graph)
> {
> + if (tracer_enabled)
> + ftrace_unsafe_rcu_checker_enable();
> +
> tracer_enabled = 0;
>
> unregister_irqsoff_function(graph);
> @@ -630,11 +638,15 @@ static void irqsoff_tracer_reset(struct trace_array *tr)
>
> static void irqsoff_tracer_start(struct trace_array *tr)
> {
> + if (!tracer_enabled)
> + ftrace_unsafe_rcu_checker_disable();
> tracer_enabled = 1;
> }
>
> static void irqsoff_tracer_stop(struct trace_array *tr)
> {
> + if (tracer_enabled)
> + ftrace_unsafe_rcu_checker_enable();
> tracer_enabled = 0;
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-31 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-31 5:11 [RFC][PATCH 00/18 v2] ftrace/rcu: Handle unsafe RCU functions and ftrace callbacks Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/18 v2] ftrace: Add hash list to save RCU unsafe functions Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 19:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-03 21:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-09-03 22:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-03 23:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-09-04 0:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-09-04 1:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 19/18] ftrace: Print a message when the rcu checker is disabled Steven Rostedt
2013-09-04 1:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-04 1:24 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/18 v2] ftrace: Add hash list to save RCU unsafe functions Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-04 1:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-09-04 1:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-09-04 2:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-09-04 2:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-09-04 4:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-04 11:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-09-04 4:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31 5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/18 v2] ftrace: Do not set ftrace records for unsafe RCU when not allowed Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 19:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31 5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/18 v2] ftrace: Set ftrace internal function tracing RCU safe Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 19:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31 19:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-03 13:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-09-03 13:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31 5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/18 v2] ftrace: Add test for ops against unsafe RCU functions in callback Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 19:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31 5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/18 v2] ftrace: Do not display non safe RCU functions in available_filter_functions Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 19:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31 20:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 20:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-03 13:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-09-03 13:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31 5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/18 v2] ftrace: Add rcu_unsafe_filter_functions file Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 19:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31 5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/18 v2] ftrace: Add selftest to check if RCU unsafe functions are filtered properly Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 19:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31 5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/18 v2] ftrace/rcu: Do not trace debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled() Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 19:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31 20:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/18 v2] ftrace: Fix a slight race in modifying what function callback gets traced Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/18 v2] ftrace: Create a RCU unsafe checker Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 19:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31 5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/18 v2] ftrace: Adde infrastructure to stop RCU unsafe checker from checking Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 19:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31 20:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-09-03 13:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-09-03 15:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31 5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/18 v2] ftrace: Disable RCU unsafe checker when function graph is enabled Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 19:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31 20:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 20:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31 5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 13/18 v2] ftrace: Disable the RCU unsafe checker when irqsoff " Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 19:58 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2013-08-31 5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 14/18 v2] ftrace/lockdep: Have the RCU lockdep splat show what function triggered Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 19:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-05 19:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-05 19:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-09-06 12:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-06 13:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-09-05 19:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-05 20:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 15/18 v2] ftrace/rcu: Mark functions that are RCU unsafe Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 20:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31 20:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 20:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31 5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 16/18 v2] rcu/irq/x86: " Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 20:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31 5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 17/18 v2] ftrace/cpuidle/x86: " Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 11:07 ` Wysocki, Rafael J
2013-08-31 20:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-04 0:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-31 5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 18/18 v2] ftrace/sched: " Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 20:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31 15:50 ` [RFC][PATCH 00/18 v2] ftrace/rcu: Handle unsafe RCU functions and ftrace callbacks Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130831195827.GS3871@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox