From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752886Ab3IEN3l (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Sep 2013 09:29:41 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:22623 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751941Ab3IEN3j (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Sep 2013 09:29:39 -0400 Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 08:44:48 -0400 From: Luiz Capitulino To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, eparis@redhat.com, dan.duval@oracle.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, rgb@redhat.com, oleg@redhat.com, chuck.anderson@oracle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] audit: fix soft lockup Message-ID: <20130905084448.56e849ab@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1378183735-19338-1-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com> References: <1378183735-19338-1-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com> Organization: Red Hat Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 00:48:53 -0400 Luiz Capitulino wrote: > The second patch fixes a softlockup which is fully described and now is > 100% reproducible with simple steps. The first patch fixes a bug I found > while working on the second patch. Can someone look at this series please? This is a very reproducible bug.