From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REVIEW][PATCH] pidns: Fix hang in zap_pid_ns_processes by sending a potentially extra wakeup
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 19:56:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130908175602.GA3172@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87hae6vh0w.fsf_-_@xmission.com>
Sorry for delay, vacation.
On 08/30, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> --- a/kernel/pid.c
> +++ b/kernel/pid.c
> @@ -265,6 +265,7 @@ void free_pid(struct pid *pid)
> struct pid_namespace *ns = upid->ns;
> hlist_del_rcu(&upid->pid_chain);
> switch(--ns->nr_hashed) {
> + case 2:
> case 1:
> /* When all that is left in the pid namespace
> * is the reaper wake up the reaper. The reaper
I think the patch is fine, and this matches "init_pids" in
zap_pid_ns_processes().
But, Eric, if this patch was not applied yet, any chance you can
add a comment ? Just a little note about the potential zombie
leader can help to understand this code. I won't insist of course,
but this "case 2" doesn't look obvious.
Off topic. What if the first alloc_pid() succeeds and then later
copy_process() fails. In this case free_pid() is called but
PIDNS_HASH_ADDING was not cleared, we miss kern_unmount(), no?
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-08 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-29 21:11 [PATCH] Make sure to wake reaper Serge Hallyn
2013-08-29 22:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-08-30 0:39 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-08-30 1:10 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2013-08-30 5:07 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-08-30 12:46 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2013-08-30 14:42 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2013-08-31 0:30 ` [REVIEW][PATCH] pidns: Fix hang in zap_pid_ns_processes by sending a potentially extra wakeup Eric W. Biederman
2013-09-08 17:56 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-09-08 18:01 ` free_pid() && PIDNS_HASH_ADDING Oleg Nesterov
2013-09-08 21:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-09-09 15:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-09-09 17:54 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-09-10 14:01 ` [PATCH 0/1] pidns: fix free_pid() to handle the first fork failure Oleg Nesterov
2013-09-10 14:01 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
[not found] ` <CALkWK0kSBrN-ZHG0CEWwvjYQ86ArJtDmbKqJR_6f3_ZTN6xJQQ@mail.gmail.com>
2013-09-09 0:12 ` [REVIEW][PATCH] pidns: Fix hang in zap_pid_ns_processes by sending a potentially extra wakeup Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130908175602.GA3172@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox