From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: wei_wang@realsil.com.cn
Cc: sameo@linux.intel.com, devel@linuxdriverproject.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
rogerable@realtek.com, micky_ching@realsil.com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mfd: rtsx: Modify rts5249_optimize_phy
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 14:02:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130909130211.GG22938@lee--X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e858b38c5b87dd761c764c6214f49cf9a9b5ad1d.1378437776.git.wei_wang@realsil.com.cn>
On Fri, 06 Sep 2013, wei_wang@realsil.com.cn wrote:
> From: Wei WANG <wei_wang@realsil.com.cn>
>
> In some platforms, specially Thinkpad series, rts5249 won't be
> initialized properly. So we need adjust some phy parameters to
> improve the compatibility issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei WANG <wei_wang@realsil.com.cn>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/rts5249.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> include/linux/mfd/rtsx_pci.h | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rts5249.c b/drivers/mfd/rts5249.c
> index 3b835f5..7653638 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/rts5249.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/rts5249.c
Ignoring the driver code for now.
> static int rts5249_turn_on_led(struct rtsx_pcr *pcr)
> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/rtsx_pci.h b/include/linux/mfd/rtsx_pci.h
> index d1382df..de20538 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mfd/rtsx_pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/rtsx_pci.h
> @@ -719,16 +719,41 @@
>
> /* Phy register */
> #define PHY_PCR 0x00
> +#define FORCE_CODE 0xB000
> +#define OOBS_CALI_50 0x0800
> +#define OOBS_VCM_08 0x0200
> +#define OOBS_SEN_90 0x0040
> +#define RSSI_EN 0x0002
> #define PHY_RCR0 0x01
> #define PHY_RCR1 0x02
> +#define ADP_TIME 0x0100
> +#define VCO_COARSE 0x001F
> #define PHY_RCR2 0x03
> +#define EMPHASE_EN 0x8000
> +#define NADJR 0x4000
> +#define CDR_CP_10 0x0400
> +#define CDR_SR_2 0x0100
> +#define FREQSEL_12 0x0040
> +#define CPADJEN 0x0020
> +#define CDR_SC_8 0x0008
> +#define CALIB_LATE 0x0002
> #define PHY_RTCR 0x04
> #define PHY_RDR 0x05
> +#define RXDSEL_1_9 0x4000
> #define PHY_TCR0 0x06
> #define PHY_TCR1 0x07
> #define PHY_TUNE 0x08
> +#define TUNEREF_1_0 0x4000
> +#define VBGSEL_1252 0x0C00
> +#define SDBUS_33 0x0200
> +#define TUNED18 0x01C0
> +#define TUNED12 0X0020
> #define PHY_IMR 0x09
> #define PHY_BPCR 0x0A
> +#define IBRXSEL 0x0400
> +#define IBTXSEL 0x0100
> +#define IB_FILTER 0x0080
> +#define CMIRROR_EN 0x0040
> #define PHY_BIST 0x0B
> #define PHY_RAW_L 0x0C
> #define PHY_RAW_H 0x0D
> @@ -744,11 +769,29 @@
> #define PHY_BRNR2 0x17
> #define PHY_BENR 0x18
> #define PHY_REG_REV 0x19
> +#define REG_REV_RESV 0xE000
> +#define RXIDLE_LATCHED 0x1000
> +#define P1_EN 0x0800
> +#define RXIDLE_EN 0x0400
> +#define CLKREQ_DLY_TIMER_1_0 0x0040
> +#define STOP_CLKRD 0x0020
> +#define RX_PWST 0x0008
> +#define STOP_CLKWR 0x0004
> #define PHY_FLD0 0x1A
> #define PHY_FLD1 0x1B
> #define PHY_FLD2 0x1C
> #define PHY_FLD3 0x1D
> +#define TIMER_4 0x7800
> +#define TIMER_6 0x00E0
> +#define RXDELINK 0x0004
> #define PHY_FLD4 0x1E
> +#define FLDEN_SEL 0x4000
> +#define REQ_REF 0x2000
> +#define RXAMP_OFF 0x1000
> +#define REQ_ADDA 0x0800
> +#define BER_COUNT 0x00E0
> +#define BER_TIMER 0x000A
> +#define BER_CHK_EN 0x0001
> #define PHY_DUM_REG 0x1F
>
> #define LCTLR 0x80
This doesn't look right.
We had a nicely structured, ordered list and now you've seemingly
randomly shoved a truck load of un-prefixed defines between them.
Am I missing something? Is there method to the madness?
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-09 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-06 3:40 [PATCH v2] mfd: rtsx: Modify rts5249_optimize_phy wei_wang
2013-09-06 3:40 ` wei_wang
2013-09-09 13:02 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2013-09-10 1:09 ` wwang
2013-09-10 7:29 ` Lee Jones
2013-09-09 13:02 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130909130211.GG22938@lee--X1 \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=micky_ching@realsil.com.cn \
--cc=rogerable@realtek.com \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=wei_wang@realsil.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox