From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752788Ab3IJQea (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Sep 2013 12:34:30 -0400 Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk ([80.68.93.111]:50151 "EHLO cassiel.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751593Ab3IJQe2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Sep 2013 12:34:28 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 17:33:58 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Laxman Dewangan Cc: "rob.herring@calxeda.com" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "swarren@wwwdotorg.org" , "rob@landley.net" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "lgirdwood@gmail.com" Message-ID: <20130910163358.GP29403@sirena.org.uk> References: <1378811888-2268-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <1378811888-2268-2-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <20130910120922.GH29403@sirena.org.uk> <522F1B40.3040801@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7316+HbuJYr43y0H" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <522F1B40.3040801@nvidia.com> X-Cookie: Your present plans will be successful. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.92.69 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: core: add support for configuring turn-on time through constraints X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:57:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on cassiel.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --7316+HbuJYr43y0H Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 06:44:40PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > Here my intention for turn-on time is the time from OFF state to ON > state and the ON voltage settled on this time. > This time is separate from underlying enable time of the device i.e. > will not get added. > We observe in some of platform that some of regulator is taking more > time than time given as per datasheet. > Yes, completely agree that this is not the data provided normally, > just we observe on scope that some of platform shows more than the > datasheet value and hence this patch. So, put this in the binding document then! :P This was more a request to improve the detail in the binding than anything else. --7316+HbuJYr43y0H Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSL0nzAAoJELSic+t+oim9Pn4QAJMFmNplzGJv7Q8YhCrxFVZy dUdM43gvzYZD+mJPclyWNFJaGg4aQWAFUCFxhaHC+A8i2J13XpyJtjh9DHpu5u7S EQvY1B49uP4J/79RgClQzpAcwKjJ8evpsFzn+r7e5p+5NFcG8t6sFBAT2JSB2v/7 SxzAxWtODQWswY/NIeFL/KsPkNfJM8IUtcgq4pEa7e2LAIYR2vOby8Eg5KQgN+s7 54ayDo2qyroeoZnrNQTrTUYlSgX/cGYcKugK8yZhjc3Lb14OUoIQwIuPRmGkJEj9 SyfqG4zf3cJ/igXMIjn4VOJz0RZMXgT2LkrEJYrmqXk3pat3tuA2TL8Cx0wgfIV0 Bu3ViNknIuDWO7GHWPG3rQzIcu9lsYq2ATmObEQvD5D8AgI4K4uGgbuhtlGH/1kL qOX2PapH7mslhHu4CogY6MTD9Al2j8X24jlMwNt+kj+Mho2dDJYMuLSBdao5nlNx /TlAfFggYj3qPZyKBNe9AOPfnLAVAe/AjBmodW58dY1TkRaK5bsO/u+6e18X0/Kj yS3s6yX9DZiCy2vvYxEsr3pjjipBrAytr1GLj4KCttrf+Bmr5qfm/AmZ7kZ4z2V6 t/hkpW8NZRKAIfR/xvj/b8xC55thiaBYtvt45c7JLFtK0lN6TXllfaJNY/b4uOof 5TRfPzsNB7m55TdEKwf9 =tVsN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7316+HbuJYr43y0H--