From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Chris Brannon <chris@the-brannons.com>
Cc: Raphael S Carvalho <raphael.scarv@gmail.com>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Kirk Reiser <kirk@reisers.ca>,
speakup@braille.uwo.ca,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] staging/speakup/kobjects.c: Code improvement.
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 02:12:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130910231228.GF6329@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y576edm6.fsf@mushroom.PK5001Z>
Good eye for spotting the memory corruption bug!
This is a bug fix, so the fix should go in a separate patch and not
merged with a code cleanup patch. Ordinary users can trigger this so
it's a security bug and separating it out is extra important.
The checking in spk_set_num_var() is not sufficient as well. If we use
E_INC then we can hit an integer overflow bug:
drivers/staging/speakup/varhandlers.c
198 if (how == E_SET)
199 val = input;
200 else
201 val = var_data->u.n.value;
202 if (how == E_INC)
203 val += input;
"input" comes from the user. This addition can overflow so that input
is a very high number and now "val" is a low enough number.
204 else if (how == E_DEC)
205 val -= input;
206 if (val < var_data->u.n.low || val > var_data->u.n.high)
207 return -ERANGE;
"val" is valid, but "input" is not valid. We use "input" in the caller
function as the index to an array.
208 }
I guess that's simple enough to fix but why is the caller using "input"
instead of "val"?
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-10 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-02 22:20 [PATCH 1/1] staging/speakup/kobjects.c: Code improvement Raphael S.Carvalho
2013-09-09 3:56 ` Chris Brannon
[not found] ` <CACz=WeeE+jxdaxpR_amF60deDcEy8nChYYfY3UA3CNfhmOB8Gw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-09-09 4:16 ` Fwd: " Raphael S Carvalho
2013-09-09 6:02 ` Chris Brannon
2013-09-10 23:12 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2013-09-11 1:29 ` Chris Brannon
2013-09-11 7:59 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-11 21:01 ` Samuel Thibault
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-06-22 1:54 Raphael S. Carvalho
2013-06-30 8:11 ` Samuel Thibault
2013-07-23 21:39 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130910231228.GF6329@mwanda \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@the-brannons.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kirk@reisers.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raphael.scarv@gmail.com \
--cc=samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org \
--cc=speakup@braille.uwo.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox