From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Arun Sharma <asharma@fb.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kumar Sundararajan <kumar@fb.com>
Subject: Re: clock_gettime_ns
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 20:50:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130911185008.GB8759@netboy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrWJbtrC0FDKFQ7_qS8sdxd7LyJk562uAzrK1TJqy97YOA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:47:01AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> I think that coming up with something that's both non-POSIX and
> half-arsed is a bad idea, but doing something that's non-POSIX and
> well thought-through could be valuable.
I know Harlan Stenn of the Network Time Foundation is working on a new
timestamp API and presented a paper at the conference:
Requirements for UTC and Civil Timekeeping on Earth
A Colloquium Addressing a Continuous Time Standard
University of Virginia, Charlottesville, May 29-31, 2013.
http://www.cacr.caltech.edu/futureofutc/
The slides are on that site, and I would bet that the paper could be
made available. In any case, since I think any kind of new time API idea
would benefit from review and acceptance from the NTP and BSD people.
Thanks,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-11 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-04 9:18 clock_gettime_ns Arun Sharma
2013-09-04 18:51 ` clock_gettime_ns Andy Lutomirski
2013-09-04 19:20 ` clock_gettime_ns John Stultz
2013-09-04 20:33 ` clock_gettime_ns Andy Lutomirski
2013-09-04 20:54 ` clock_gettime_ns John Stultz
2013-09-04 22:29 ` clock_gettime_ns H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-04 22:59 ` clock_gettime_ns John Stultz
2013-09-04 23:04 ` clock_gettime_ns H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-04 23:20 ` clock_gettime_ns John Stultz
2013-09-04 23:38 ` clock_gettime_ns Andy Lutomirski
2013-09-05 1:22 ` clock_gettime_ns H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-09 17:47 ` clock_gettime_ns Andy Lutomirski
2013-09-11 18:50 ` Richard Cochran [this message]
2013-09-04 19:17 ` clock_gettime_ns John Stultz
2013-09-04 20:23 ` clock_gettime_ns Andy Lutomirski
2013-09-04 20:50 ` clock_gettime_ns John Stultz
2013-09-05 4:45 ` clock_gettime_ns Arun Sharma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130911185008.GB8759@netboy \
--to=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=asharma@fb.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=kumar@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox