From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au, fan.du@windriver.com,
steffen.klassert@secunet.com, dborkman@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 linux-next] hrtimer: Add notifier when clock_was_set was called
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 13:32:52 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130912.133252.425268707009916773.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1309121636010.4089@ionos.tec.linutronix.de>
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 16:43:37 +0200 (CEST)
> So what about going back to timer_list timers and simply utilize
> register_pm_notifier(), which will tell you that the system resumed?
The thing to understand is that there are two timeouts for an IPSEC
rule, a soft and a hard timeout.
There is a gap between these two exactly so that we can negotiate a
new encapsulation with the IPSEC gateway before communication ceases
to be possible over the IPSEC protected path.
So the idea is that the soft timeout triggers the re-negotiation,
and after a hard timeout the IPSEC path is no longer usable and
all communication will fail.
Simply triggering a re-negoation after every suspend/resume makes
no sense at all. Spurious re-negotiations are undesirable.
What we want are real timers. We want that rather than a "we
suspended so just assume all timers expired" event which is not very
useful for this kind of application.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-12 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1375866296-15079-1-git-send-email-fan.du@windriver.com>
[not found] ` <1375866296-15079-2-git-send-email-fan.du@windriver.com>
[not found] ` <52021177.6020306@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <520213F2.5090401@windriver.com>
[not found] ` <520214C6.6000307@redhat.com>
2013-08-14 8:52 ` [PATCHv3 linux-next] hrtimer: Add notifier when clock_was_set was called Fan Du
2013-08-14 19:04 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-08-18 9:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-08-20 1:56 ` Fan Du
2013-09-12 13:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-09-12 13:44 ` Herbert Xu
2013-09-12 14:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-09-12 17:32 ` David Miller [this message]
2013-09-12 19:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-09-13 2:46 ` Fan Du
2013-09-13 14:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-09-16 0:26 ` Fan Du
2013-09-16 9:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-09-17 7:47 ` Fan Du
2013-09-12 20:35 ` John Stultz
2013-09-12 20:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130912.133252.425268707009916773.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=fan.du@windriver.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).