public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Restrict kernel spawning of threads to a specified set of cpus.
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 11:51:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130912185107.GV3966@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130912183503.GB25386@somewhere>

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:35:05PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:39:22AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 05:11:04PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 02:52:56PM +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 12 Sep 2013, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > > > Ok but you can change the affinity of a kthread from userspace, as
> > > > > > > long as you define a cpu set that is among that kthread's cpus allowed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ok but at that point kthread has already spawned a lot of kernel threads.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The same is true for init and kmod.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Ok but then we just need to set the affinity of all these kthreads.
> > > > > A simple lookup on /proc/[0-9]+/ should do the trick.
> > > > 
> > > > Yea but the kernel option makes it easy. No extras needed. Kernel brings
> > > > it up user space cleanly configured and ready to go.
> > > 
> > > Ok but really that's just two lines of bash. I really wish we don't complicate
> > > core kernel code for that.
> > 
> > OK, I will bite...  How do you handle the case where you have collected
> > all the kthreads, one of the kthreads spawns another kthread, then you
> > set affinity on the collected kthreads, which does not include the newly
> > spawned one?
> 
> Just offline the CPUs you want to isolate, affine your kthreads and re-online
> the CPUs.
> 
> If you're lucky enough to have 1024 CPUs, a winter night should be enough ;-)

Running at RT prio 99 to reduce the probability of respawns?  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul


  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-12 18:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-05 20:07 [RFC] Restrict kernel spawning of threads to a specified set of cpus Christoph Lameter
2013-09-10  6:05 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2013-09-10  6:47   ` Mike Galbraith
2013-09-10  6:59     ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2013-09-10  7:26       ` Mike Galbraith
2013-09-10  7:56         ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2013-09-10  8:53           ` Mike Galbraith
2013-09-10 21:10           ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-11  3:20             ` Mike Galbraith
2013-09-11 14:21               ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-11 14:53                 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-09-11 16:56                   ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-11 21:36                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-12  3:30                   ` Mike Galbraith
2013-09-10 21:08   ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-10  7:39 ` Rob Landley
2013-09-10 21:11   ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-11 22:02 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-12 14:10   ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-12 14:16     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-12 14:22       ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-12 14:31         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-12 14:52           ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-12 15:11             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-12 15:32               ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-12 18:45                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-12 15:39               ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-12 18:35                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-12 18:51                   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2013-09-15 13:53                   ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
     [not found]               ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1309121030390.21473@gentwo.org>
2013-09-12 15:42                 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-12 18:30                   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-13  9:25                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-13 13:54                       ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-13 14:40                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-13 15:15                           ` Christoph Lameter
     [not found]                           ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1309131010480.26487@gentwo.org>
2013-09-13 15:40                             ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-16  6:02                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-13 13:45                     ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-13 14:04                       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-13 14:25                         ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-15 13:47       ` Gilad Ben-Yossef

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130912185107.GV3966@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=gilad@benyossef.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox