From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Restrict kernel spawning of threads to a specified set of cpus.
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 11:51:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130912185107.GV3966@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130912183503.GB25386@somewhere>
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:35:05PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:39:22AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 05:11:04PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 02:52:56PM +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 12 Sep 2013, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > > Ok but you can change the affinity of a kthread from userspace, as
> > > > > > > long as you define a cpu set that is among that kthread's cpus allowed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ok but at that point kthread has already spawned a lot of kernel threads.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The same is true for init and kmod.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Ok but then we just need to set the affinity of all these kthreads.
> > > > > A simple lookup on /proc/[0-9]+/ should do the trick.
> > > >
> > > > Yea but the kernel option makes it easy. No extras needed. Kernel brings
> > > > it up user space cleanly configured and ready to go.
> > >
> > > Ok but really that's just two lines of bash. I really wish we don't complicate
> > > core kernel code for that.
> >
> > OK, I will bite... How do you handle the case where you have collected
> > all the kthreads, one of the kthreads spawns another kthread, then you
> > set affinity on the collected kthreads, which does not include the newly
> > spawned one?
>
> Just offline the CPUs you want to isolate, affine your kthreads and re-online
> the CPUs.
>
> If you're lucky enough to have 1024 CPUs, a winter night should be enough ;-)
Running at RT prio 99 to reduce the probability of respawns? ;-)
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-12 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-05 20:07 [RFC] Restrict kernel spawning of threads to a specified set of cpus Christoph Lameter
2013-09-10 6:05 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2013-09-10 6:47 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-09-10 6:59 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2013-09-10 7:26 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-09-10 7:56 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2013-09-10 8:53 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-09-10 21:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-11 3:20 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-09-11 14:21 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-11 14:53 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-09-11 16:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-11 21:36 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-12 3:30 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-09-10 21:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-10 7:39 ` Rob Landley
2013-09-10 21:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-11 22:02 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-12 14:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-12 14:16 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-12 14:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-12 14:31 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-12 14:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-12 15:11 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-12 15:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-12 18:45 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-12 15:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-12 18:35 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-12 18:51 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2013-09-15 13:53 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1309121030390.21473@gentwo.org>
2013-09-12 15:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-12 18:30 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-13 9:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-13 13:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-13 14:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-13 15:15 ` Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1309131010480.26487@gentwo.org>
2013-09-13 15:40 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-16 6:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-13 13:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-13 14:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-13 14:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-15 13:47 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130912185107.GV3966@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=gilad@benyossef.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox