Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree

Al Viro
2013-09-10T22:59:43Z

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:48:23PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:41:16PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > Obtained from where? There are a whole pile of fixes resulting from
> > review and linux-next testing. Are they included?
>
> -next and yes. The trivial ones - folded into the commits they are fixing
> (I mean, ones directly following the commit being fixed). The rest included
> as individual commits.
>
> I'm looking through the DCACHE_LRU_LIST mess right now...

It's not that bad, actually; I think the variant I've pushed right now
(vfs.git#for-next, head at f5e1dd34561e0fb06400b378d595198918833021) should
be doing the right thing. It ought to cover everything in your branch
in -next from "fs: bump inode and dentry counters to long" on to the
end of queue.