From: Alexey Neyman <stilor@att.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH PING] Fix coalescing of host bridge windows in arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 09:41:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201309160941.54844.stilor@att.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201309121719.17447.stilor@att.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1413 bytes --]
Hi all,
Could anybody review/commit the patch?
Regards,
Alexey.
On Thursday, September 12, 2013 05:19:16 pm Alexey Neyman wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a board with a BIOS bug that reports the following I/O port regions
> in _CRS on one of the host bridges:
>
> 0x0000-0x03af // #0
> 0x03e0-0x0cf7 // #1
> 0x03b0-0x03bb // #2
> 0x03c0-0x03df // #3
> 0x0000-0xdfff // #4
> 0xf000-0xffff // #5
>
> Obviously, region number #4 is erroneous as it overlaps with regions #0..3.
> However, code in coalesce_windows() in arch/x86/pci/acpi.c attempts to
> recover from such kind of BIOS bugs by merging the overlapping regions.
> Current code expands region #0 to 0x0000-0xdffff and makes region #4
> ignored. As a result, overlap of the expanded region #0 with regions #1..3
> remains undetected. As a result, regions #1..3 are inserted into the
> resource tree as if they were consumers of the 0x0000-0xdfff regions, and
> devices that have resources in one of these regions (e.g. 0x3f6 for legacy
> IDE) have a resource conflict - the kernel does not initialize them.
>
> The attached patch makes the code in coalesce_windows() instead ignore res1
> (which is already dealt with), possibly expanding res2 instead. As res2 has
> not been reached in the outer loop in coalesce_windows(), the code will
> then check for overlaps of the just-expanded resource with the rest of the
> resources.
>
> Regards,
> Alexey.
[-- Attachment #2: acpi.c.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 633 bytes --]
--- arch/x86/pci/acpi.c.orig 2013-09-12 16:23:06.113813150 -0700
+++ arch/x86/pci/acpi.c 2013-09-12 16:23:56.605813117 -0700
@@ -357,12 +357,12 @@
* the kernel resource tree doesn't allow overlaps.
*/
if (resource_overlaps(res1, res2)) {
- res1->start = min(res1->start, res2->start);
- res1->end = max(res1->end, res2->end);
+ res2->start = min(res1->start, res2->start);
+ res2->end = max(res1->end, res2->end);
dev_info(&info->bridge->dev,
"host bridge window expanded to %pR; %pR ignored\n",
- res1, res2);
- res2->flags = 0;
+ res2, res1);
+ res1->flags = 0;
}
}
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-16 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-13 0:19 [PATCH] Fix coalescing of host bridge windows in arch/x86/pci/acpi.c Alexey Neyman
2013-09-16 16:41 ` Alexey Neyman [this message]
2013-09-16 23:31 ` [PATCH PING] " Peter Hurley
2013-09-18 0:49 ` Alexey Neyman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201309160941.54844.stilor@att.net \
--to=stilor@att.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox