From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752823Ab3IQJSa (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Sep 2013 05:18:30 -0400 Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:48750 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751736Ab3IQJSZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Sep 2013 05:18:25 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 10:18:23 +0100 From: Charles Keepax To: Lee Jones Cc: sameo@linux.intel.com, patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: arizona: Update volatile registers for WM5110 DSP Message-ID: <20130917091823.GF3635@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1379345514-2998-1-git-send-email-ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20130917072425.GP16984@lee--X1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130917072425.GP16984@lee--X1> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org No problem sorry the commit message was a little vague there. Seems I accidentally generated the first version of this patch against the ASoC tree, but this got me thinking now you are looking after MFD patches which tree should I be generating them against? Thanks, Charles On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 08:24:25AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 16 Sep 2013, Charles Keepax wrote: > > Any chance of a little more information in the commit message? > > What are scratch registers and why are they required now where they > weren't before? Why are the control and clocking regulators no longer > needed?