From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lkp@01.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: increased vmap_area_lock contentions on "n_tty: Move buffers into n_tty_data"
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 07:22:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130917232214.GA11390@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5238767D.1080606@hurleysoftware.com>
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:34:21AM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 09/12/2013 09:09 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 08:51:33AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> >>Hi Peter,
> >>
> >>FYI, we noticed much increased vmap_area_lock contentions since this
> >>commit:
> >>
> >>commit 20bafb3d23d108bc0a896eb8b7c1501f4f649b77
> >>Author: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
> >>Date: Sat Jun 15 10:21:19 2013 -0400
> >>
> >> n_tty: Move buffers into n_tty_data
> >>
> >> Reduce pointer reloading and improve locality-of-reference;
> >> allocate read_buf and echo_buf within struct n_tty_data.
> >
> >Here are some comparison between this commit [o] with its parent commit [*].
>
> Hi Fenguang,
>
> Can you give the particulars of the aim7 test runs below?
> I ask because I get _no_ added contention on the vmap_area_lock when I run
> these tests on a dual-socket xeon.
>
> What is the machine configuration(s)?
> Are you using the aim7 'multitask' test driver or your own custom driver?
> What is the load configuration (ie., constant, linearly increasing, convergence)?
> How many loads are you simulating?
The aim7 tests are basically
(
echo $HOSTNAME
echo $workfile
echo 1
echo 2000
echo 2
echo 2000
echo 1
) | ./multitask -t
> lock_stat.vmap_area_lock.holdtime-total
> [...]
> > 489739.50 +978.5% 5281916.05 lkp-ne04/micro/aim7/shell_rtns_1
> > 1601675.63 +906.7% 16123642.52 lkp-snb01/micro/aim7/exec_test
> [...]
> > 822461.02 +1585.0% 13858430.62 nhm-white/micro/aim7/exec_test
> > 9858.11 +2715.9% 277595.41 nhm-white/micro/aim7/fork_test
> [...]
> > 300.14 +2621.5% 8168.53 nhm-white/micro/aim7/misc_rtns_1
> > 345479.21 +1624.5% 5957828.25 nhm-white/micro/aim7/shell_rtns_1
>
>
> None of the tests below execute a code path that leads to get_vmalloc_info().
> The only in-kernel user of get_vmalloc_info() is a sysfs read of /proc/meminfo,
> which none of the tests below perform.
>
> What is reading /proc/meminfo?
Good point! That may explain it: I'm running a
loop:
cat /proc/meminfo
sleep 1
in all the tests.
Thanks,
Fengguang
> > lock_stat.vmap_area_lock.contentions.get_vmalloc_info
> >
> > 8cb06c983822103da1cf 20bafb3d23d108bc0a89
> >------------------------ ------------------------
> > 4952.40 +447.0% 27090.40 lkp-ne04/micro/aim7/shell_rtns_1
> > 28410.80 +556.2% 186423.00 lkp-snb01/micro/aim7/exec_test
> > 8142.00 +615.4% 58247.33 nhm-white/micro/aim7/exec_test
> > 1386.00 +762.6% 11955.20 nhm-white/micro/aim7/shell_rtns_1
> > 42891.20 +561.5% 283715.93 TOTAL lock_stat.vmap_area_lock.contentions.get_vmalloc_info
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-17 23:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-13 0:51 increased vmap_area_lock contentions on "n_tty: Move buffers into n_tty_data" Fengguang Wu
2013-09-13 1:09 ` Fengguang Wu
2013-09-17 15:34 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-17 23:22 ` Fengguang Wu [this message]
2013-09-18 0:22 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-25 9:04 ` Lin Ming
2013-09-25 11:30 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-25 14:53 ` Lin Ming
2013-09-25 16:02 ` Lin Ming
2013-09-26 3:20 ` Andi Kleen
2013-09-26 11:52 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-26 15:32 ` Andi Kleen
2013-09-26 17:22 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-26 7:33 ` Andrew Morton
2013-09-26 11:31 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-26 15:04 ` Greg KH
2013-09-26 17:35 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-26 18:05 ` Andrew Morton
2013-09-26 21:42 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-26 21:58 ` Andrew Morton
2013-09-26 22:21 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-18 0:49 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-13 3:17 ` Greg KH
2013-09-13 3:38 ` Fengguang Wu
2013-09-13 3:44 ` Greg KH
2013-09-13 9:55 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-13 12:34 ` Greg KH
2013-09-17 2:42 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-17 2:56 ` Fengguang Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130917232214.GA11390@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@01.org \
--cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox