linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@au1.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] irq: Fix stack overflow due to softirq called on current stack
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:51:01 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130918065101.GA22060@drongo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1378395204-25342-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>

Frederic,

On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 05:33:21PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 
> This series is a proposition to fix the crash reported here: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1378330796.4321.50.camel%40pasglop
> And it has the upside to also consolidate a bit the arch do_softirq overriden implementation.

I tried this series on a ppc64 machine running KVM guests and doing
network traffic, while under memory pressure, and it seems to work
fine.  Although the original problem was never completely
deterministically reproducible, the problem did originally show up
with the combination of memory pressure, network traffic and KVM
guests.  I pushed the test machine moderately hard for a while and
there was no sign of stack overflow.  So:

Tested-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>

Are you going to push this upstream?

Thanks,
Paul.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-09-18  6:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-04 21:39 do_softirq() vs __do_softirq() in irq_exit() and stack overflow Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-09-05  0:27 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-09-05 13:29 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-05 15:33 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] irq: Fix stack overflow due to softirq called on current stack Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-05 15:33   ` [PATCH 1/3] irq: Consolidate do_softirq() arch overriden implementations Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-05 15:33   ` [PATCH 2/3] irq: Execute softirq on its own stack on irq exit Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-05 15:33   ` [PATCH 3/3] irq: Comment on the use of inline stack for ksoftirq Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-05 22:56     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-05 22:18   ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] irq: Fix stack overflow due to softirq called on current stack Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-09-18  6:51   ` Paul Mackerras [this message]
2013-09-19 15:38     ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130918065101.GA22060@drongo \
    --to=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
    --cc=jejb@parisc-linux.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@au1.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).