public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
	Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Did immutable bvecs accidentally break stable page writes?
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 10:40:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130919094030.GT22421@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130919093250.GS22421@suse.de>

On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:32:50AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Commit ffecfd1a (block: optionally snapshot page contents to provide
> stable pages during write) uses bounce buffers for stable page writes in
> jbd and ext3. Simplistically, __blk_queue_bounce takes a force parameter
> that is used when pages must be snapshot.
> 
> Commit 6bc454d1 (bounce: Refactor __blk_queue_bounce to not use
> bi_io_vec) refactored __blk_queue_bounce and now the start of the
> function looks like this
> 
> static void __blk_queue_bounce(struct request_queue *q, struct bio **bio_orig,
> 			       mempool_t *pool, int force)
> {
> 	struct bio *bio;
> 	int rw = bio_data_dir(*bio_orig);
> 	struct bio_vec *to, *from;
> 	unsigned i;
> 
> 	bio_for_each_segment(from, *bio_orig, i)
> 		if (page_to_pfn(from->bv_page) > queue_bounce_pfn(q))
> 			goto bounce;
> 
> 	return;
> bounce:
> 	bio = bio_clone_bioset(*bio_orig, GFP_NOIO, fs_bio_set);
> 
> 	bio_for_each_segment_all(to, bio, i) {
> 		struct page *page = to->bv_page;
> 
> 		if (page_to_pfn(page) <= queue_bounce_pfn(q) && !force)
> 			continue;
> 
> Note that the first bio_for_each_segment is completely ignoring the
> force parameter and hence snapshotting. This is particularly problematic
> for ext3 which forces the use of MS_SNAP_STABLE.
> 

Which of course is no longer a problem for ext3 after commit 71368511
("mm: make snapshotting pages for stable writes a per-bio operation). The
folly of looking at a commit in isolation! I'm still curious why the force
parameter is ignored when stable writes are required though.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-19  9:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-19  9:32 Did immutable bvecs accidentally break stable page writes? Mel Gorman
2013-09-19  9:40 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2013-09-19 14:22   ` Jan Kara
2013-09-20  2:38   ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130919094030.GT22421@suse.de \
    --to=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=koverstreet@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox