Re: [PATCH 1/3] Add smp support for Allwinner A20(sunxi 7i).

["maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com" <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1796 bytes --]

Hi,

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:43:55PM +0800, cinifr wrote:
> > In which case this kernel patch needs instead to speak the bootloader
> > wakeup protocol instead of speaking to the h/w directly like you've done
> > here, right?
> >
> > Or is it possible for the bootloader to set these things up and then put
> > the CPU back to sleep such that it both retains any settings and is
> > wakable by this patch? This code contains core resets and power control,
> > which makes me suspect not.
> 
> And I think secondary cpus  remains setting after h/w boot.
> >> > Wouldn't it be better to do all this stuff in the bootloader and
> >> either
> >> > implement PSCI or have the bootloader do the traditional holding pen
> >> and
> >> > mbox address thing?
> Uboot doesnot support PSCI, it use  traditional holding pen for sunxi
> platform now.
> 
> >> >
> >> I have modified uboot to set cntfrq and cntvoff in all smp cpus,and it
> >> works well. I guess kernel should believe all cpu should be all same
> >> when kernel boot. Bootloader should do it to ensure that.
> >
> > Yes, I think all CPUs must be in the same state at boot.
> >
> > But if you've done all that then what is this patch for?
> >
> > Do you have links to your u-boot patches?
> >
> > Ian.
> Yes, This is my patch for uboot.
> My working uboot code is in https://github.com/linux-sunxi/u-boot-sunxi.git
> Note this is only test patch. I have not commit it  formally for uboot.

Please do so. I'd like very much to avoid ending up in a situation where
we would break the mainline kernel for the A20, without any bootloader
we can point the users to to fix the issues.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]