public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	akpm@linuxfoundation.org, Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [pchecks v1 3/4] Use raw_cpu_ops for refresh_cpu_vm_stats()
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 09:43:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130924074351.GF28538@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000001414c47a1ab-17a7541e-54ac-4c15-8a02-66c83c358cbd-000000@email.amazonses.com>


* Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> wrote:

> We do not care about races for the expiration logic in
> refresh_cpu_vm_stats(). Draining is a rare act after all.
> No need to create too much overhead for that.
> 
> Use raw_cpu_ops there.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
> 
> Index: linux/mm/vmstat.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/mm/vmstat.c	2013-09-23 10:20:31.742262228 -0500
> +++ linux/mm/vmstat.c	2013-09-23 10:20:31.738262268 -0500
> @@ -439,6 +439,10 @@ static inline void fold_diff(int *diff)
>   * statistics in the remote zone struct as well as the global cachelines
>   * with the global counters. These could cause remote node cache line
>   * bouncing and will have to be only done when necessary.
> + *
> + * Note that we have to use raw_cpu ops here. The thread is pinned
> + * to a specific processor but the preempt checking logic does not
> + * know about this.

That's not actually true - debug_smp_processor_id() does a check for the 
pinning status of the current task:

        /*
         * Kernel threads bound to a single CPU can safely use
         * smp_processor_id():
         */
        if (cpumask_equal(tsk_cpus_allowed(current), cpumask_of(this_cpu)))
                goto out;

You should factor out those existing debug checks and reuse them, instead 
of using inferior ones.

Note that debug_smp_processor_id() can probably be optimized a bit: today 
we have p->nr_cpus_allowed which tracks the pinning status, so instead of 
the above line we could write this cheaper form:

	if (current->nr_cpus_allowed == 1)
		goto out;

(This should help on kernels configured for larger systems where the 
cpumask is non-trivial.)

What we cannot do is to hide the weakness of the debug check you added by 
adding various workarounds to core code.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-24  7:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20130923191256.584672290@linux.com>
2013-09-23 19:12 ` [pchecks v1 1/4] Subject; percpu: Add raw_cpu_ops Christoph Lameter
2013-09-23 19:12 ` [pchecks v1 2/4] Use raw cpu ops for calls that would trigger with checks Christoph Lameter
2013-09-24  7:28   ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-24  7:32   ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-24 12:45     ` Eric Dumazet
2013-09-24  7:34   ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-23 19:24 ` [pchecks v1 3/4] Use raw_cpu_ops for refresh_cpu_vm_stats() Christoph Lameter
2013-09-24  7:43   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-09-23 19:24 ` [pchecks v1 4/4] percpu: Add preemption checks to __this_cpu ops Christoph Lameter
2013-09-24  8:03   ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-24 14:24     ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-24 15:18       ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-24 15:35         ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-24 17:26           ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-25 16:46             ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-25 18:26               ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-27 14:36                 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-28  8:52                   ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130924074351.GF28538@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox