Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/3] rcu: Fix occurrence of "the the" in checklist.txt

["Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 08:33:21AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 06:55:27AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 08:47:39PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 06:17:23PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > From: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > > ---
> > > 
> > > See comment below.
> > > 
> > > >  Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt | 2 +-
> > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt
> > > > index 7703ec7..ad6cba4 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt
> > > > @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome!
> > > >  	the corresponding readers must disable preemption, possibly
> > > >  	by calling rcu_read_lock_sched() and rcu_read_unlock_sched().
> > > >  	If the updater uses synchronize_srcu() or call_srcu(),
> > > > -	the the corresponding readers must use srcu_read_lock() and
> > > > +	the corresponding readers must use srcu_read_lock() and
> > > 
> > > I think this may have actually been a typo for "then", as in "If the
> > > updater uses ..., then the corresponding readers must use ...".
> > 
> > Good point -- that would make the sentence construction parallel with
> > the surrounding sentences.  Updated patch below.
> > 
> > 							Thanx, Paul
> > 
> > rcu: Fix occurrence of "the the" in checklist.txt
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > [ paulmck: Add "then" as suggested by Josh Triplett. ]
> 
> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>

Got it, thank you again!

							Thanx, Paul

> > diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt
> > index 7703ec7..9126619 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt
> > @@ -202,8 +202,8 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome!
> >  	updater uses call_rcu_sched() or synchronize_sched(), then
> >  	the corresponding readers must disable preemption, possibly
> >  	by calling rcu_read_lock_sched() and rcu_read_unlock_sched().
> > -	If the updater uses synchronize_srcu() or call_srcu(),
> > -	the the corresponding readers must use srcu_read_lock() and
> > +	If the updater uses synchronize_srcu() or call_srcu(), then
> > +	the corresponding readers must use srcu_read_lock() and
> >  	srcu_read_unlock(), and with the same srcu_struct.  The rules for
> >  	the expedited primitives are the same as for their non-expedited
> >  	counterparts.  Mixing things up will result in confusion and
> > 
>