From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Tim Kryger <tim.kryger@linaro.org>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
patches@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: 8250_dw: Improve unwritable LCR workaround
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 15:46:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130926224655.GA15106@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380069549-9176-1-git-send-email-tim.kryger@linaro.org>
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 05:39:09PM -0700, Tim Kryger wrote:
> The Designware UART has a limitation where it ignores writes into the
> LCR if the UART is busy. The current workaround stashes a copy of the
> last written LCR and writes it back down to the hardware if it receives
> a special busy interrupt which is raised when a write was ignored.
>
> Unfortunately, interrupts are typically disabled prior to performing a
> sequence of register writes that include the LCR so the point at which
> the retry occurs is too late. An example is serial8250_do_set_termios()
> where an ignored LCR write results in the baud divisor not being set and
> instead a garbage character is sent out the transmitter.
>
> Furthermore, since serial_port_out() offers no way to indicate failure,
> a serious effort must be made to ensure that the LCR is actually updated
> before returning back to the caller. This is difficult, however, as a
> UART that was busy during the first attempt is likely to still be busy
> when a subsequent attempt is made unless some extra action is taken.
>
> This updated workaround takes the extreme action of clearing the TX/RX
> FIFOs and reading the receive buffer before writing down the LCR in the
> hope that doing so will force the UART into an idle state. While this
> may seem unnecessarily aggressive, writes to the LCR are used to change
> the baud rate, parity, stop bit, or data length so the data that may be
> lost is likely not important. Admittedly, this is far from ideal but it
> seems to be the best that can be done given the hardware limitations.
>
> Lastly, the revised workaround doesn't touch the LCR in the ISR, so it
> avoids the possibility of a "serial8250: too much work for irq" lock up.
> This problem is rare in real situations but can be reproduced easily by
> wiring up two UARTs and running the following commands.
>
> # stty -F /dev/ttyS1 echo
> # stty -F /dev/ttyS2 echo
> # cat /dev/ttyS1 &
> [1] 375
> # echo asdf > /dev/ttyS1
> asdf
>
> [ 27.700000] serial8250: too much work for irq96
> [ 27.700000] serial8250: too much work for irq96
> [ 27.710000] serial8250: too much work for irq96
> [ 27.710000] serial8250: too much work for irq96
> [ 27.720000] serial8250: too much work for irq96
> [ 27.720000] serial8250: too much work for irq96
> [ 27.730000] serial8250: too much work for irq96
> [ 27.730000] serial8250: too much work for irq96
> [ 27.740000] serial8250: too much work for irq96
>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Kryger <tim.kryger@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Matt Porter <matt.porter@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Markus Mayer <markus.mayer@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
This patch no longer applies to my tty-next tree, can you please refresh
it and resend so that I can apply it?
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-26 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-25 0:39 [PATCH] serial: 8250_dw: Improve unwritable LCR workaround Tim Kryger
2013-09-25 11:42 ` Heikki Krogerus
2013-09-25 22:47 ` Tim Kryger
2013-09-27 7:49 ` Heikki Krogerus
2013-10-01 17:13 ` Tim Kryger
2013-09-26 22:46 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130926224655.GA15106@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=tim.kryger@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox