Re: [PATCH CHAR-MISC-NEXT 1/4] Intel MIC Host Driver Sysfs Cleanups.

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 06:09:51PM -0700, Sudeep Dutt wrote:
> + Use DEVICE_ATTR_RO/RW instead of DEVICE_ATTR
> + Use ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS
> 
> These changes were suggested by Greg Kroah-Hartman during the
> code review @ https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/6/13
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dasaratharaman Chandramouli <dasaratharaman.chandramouli@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nikhil Rao <nikhil.rao@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Harshavardhan R Kharche <harshavardhan.r.kharche@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@intel.com>
> ---

Ok, new kernel developer 101 training time :)

Your Subject:, while the [PATCH] part is fine the rest of the line needs
to be a bit more descriptive.

As this is the "mic" subsystem, how about something like:
	Subject: [PATCH 1/4] misc: mic: host driver sysfs cleanups

No need for the whole "Intel MIC" stuff.

Also, as I "reported" this, you should have a:
	Reported-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <...>
line in the patch.

And really, all of those people reviewed and signed off on the patch?
That's great, just not a normal thing.

So, can you resend these 4 patches with those things cleaned up?  Same
thing goes for Joe's patch, he deserves a "Reported-by:" at the very
least, given that he pretty much wrote that whole patch.

thanks,

greg k-h