linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
	acme@ghostprotocols.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf record: mmap output file - RFC
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 08:29:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130927062932.GC6726@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5244C09B.7040500@gmail.com>


* David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 9/26/13 11:51 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >but it's still faster, since we finally get perf a chance to sleep ;-)
> >
> >new time:
> >	real    0m30.392s
> >	user    0m0.041s
> >	sys     0m0.389s
> >
> >old time:
> >	real    0m32.235s
> >	user    0m3.080s
> >	sys     0m14.444s
> >
> 
> Another data point on the performance improvement of perf itself.
> Using openssl speed as a workload and perf-stat to collect
> information about the perf-record process only:
> 
> perf stat -i -- perf record -g -o /tmp/perf.data openssl speed aes
> 
> With write():
>        158.606380 task-clock
>                 72 context-switches
>                 34 cpu-migrations
>              5,400 page-faults
>        336,054,007 cycles
>        137,804,036 stalled-cycles-frontend
>         74,505,914 stalled-cycles-backend
>        474,401,639 instructions
>         91,246,072 branches
>          1,968,289 branch-misses
> 
> With mmap():
>         50.314270 task-clock
>                 61 context-switches
>                  7 cpu-migrations
>              3,958 page-faults
>         93,585,618 cycles
>         64,878,225 stalled-cycles-frontend
>         41,680,427 stalled-cycles-backend
>         81,552,219 instructions
>         15,301,389 branches
>            387,230 branch-misses
> 
> So time, CPU cycles, instructions all drop by more than a factor of 3.

Impressive!

Btw., a perf stat bugreport: it's not clear at all that 'task-clock' is in 
units of milliseconds. Would be nice to print the unit as '(ms)' or so ...

For the other entries the unit is obvious (a count) - with the exception 
of the task-clock.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-27  6:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-23  2:05 [PATCH] perf record: mmap output file - RFC David Ahern
2013-09-26 17:51 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-09-26 18:12   ` David Ahern
2013-09-26 18:23     ` Jiri Olsa
2013-09-26 23:17   ` David Ahern
2013-09-27  6:29     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-09-27  2:24   ` Namhyung Kim
2013-10-09 13:33 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-10-09 13:46   ` David Ahern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130927062932.GC6726@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).