linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	huawei.libin@huawei.com, wangyijing@huawei.com,
	fenghua.yu@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, guohanjun@huawei.com,
	paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: Cleanup boot CPUs table
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 10:25:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130928082542.GA18198@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130927143554.GF4422@pd.tnic>


* Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:

> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> 
> As the new x86 CPU bootup printout format code maintainer, I am taking
> immediate action to improve and clean (and thus indulge my OCD) the
> reporting of the cores when coming up online.
> 
> Fix padding to a right-hand alignment, cleanup code and bind reporting
> width to the max number of supported CPUs on the system, like this:
> 
> [    0.074509] smpboot: Booting Node   0, Processors:      #1  #2  #3  #4  #5  #6  #7 OK
> [    0.644008] smpboot: Booting Node   1, Processors:  #8  #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 OK
> [    1.245006] smpboot: Booting Node   2, Processors: #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 OK
> [    1.864005] smpboot: Booting Node   3, Processors: #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 #29 #30 #31 OK
> [    2.489005] smpboot: Booting Node   4, Processors: #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 #38 #39 OK
> [    3.093005] smpboot: Booting Node   5, Processors: #40 #41 #42 #43 #44 #45 #46 #47 OK
> [    3.698005] smpboot: Booting Node   6, Processors: #48 #49 #50 #51 #52 #53 #54 #55 OK
> [    4.304005] smpboot: Booting Node   7, Processors: #56 #57 #58 #59 #60 #61 #62 #63 OK
> [    4.961413] Brought up 64 CPUs

Awesome!

Could we, with another add-on patch, further compress the first half of 
the output as well?

Advanced output like this would be really cool:

> [    0.074509] x86: Booting node #0, CPUs:       #1  #2  #3  #4  #5  #6  #7
> [    0.644008] x86: Booting node #1, CPUs:   #8  #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15
> [    1.245006] x86: Booting node #2, CPUs:  #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23
> [    1.864005] x86: Booting node #3, CPUs:  #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 #29 #30 #31
> [    2.489005] x86: Booting node #4, CPUs:  #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 #38 #39
> [    3.093005] x86: Booting node #5, CPUs:  #40 #41 #42 #43 #44 #45 #46 #47
> [    3.698005] x86: Booting node #6, CPUs:  #48 #49 #50 #51 #52 #53 #54 #55
> [    4.304005] x86: Booting node #7, CPUs:  #56 #57 #58 #59 #60 #61 #62 #63
> [    4.961413] x86: Booted up 8 nodes, 64 CPUs

and:

> [    0.072367] x86: Booting node #0, CPUs:     #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 
> [    0.686329] x86: Booted up 1 node, 8 CPUs

Note the typographical details I added:

  - I added an extra space after 'CPUs:' to make the table stand out 
    better from far away

  - Removed the 'OK' - it really does not add any more information than
    the newline already does

  - Changed the 'Brought up' message to be more consistent with the prior
    messages.

  - Added nodes count to the 'Booted up' line. Since we count nodes and
    CPUs, we might as well want to demonstrate our superior counting
    skills and print out both.

  - The 'node' counting uses the new num_digits() function - this was very
    easy to implement in my mockup ;-)

  - Note the singular spelling of 'node' in the 1-node case. Again this 
    was easy in the mockup!

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-28  8:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-05 10:57 [PATCH] x86, smpboot: fix announce_cpu() to print the last OK Libin
2013-09-05 17:52 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/smpboot: Fix announce_cpu() to printk() the last "OK" properly tip-bot for Libin
2013-09-25 10:07   ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-25 18:29     ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-26 23:15       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-27  6:51         ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-27 10:38           ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-27 14:32             ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-27 14:34               ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, alternatives: Drop ancient lockdep fixup message Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28  8:28                 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep, x86/alternatives: " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2013-09-27 14:35               ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: Cleanup boot CPUs table Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28  8:25                 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-09-28 10:23                   ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 13:44                     ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-28 17:47                       ` [PATCH] x86, boot: Further compress CPUs bootup message Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 17:54                         ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-28 18:04                           ` [PATCH -v1.1] " Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 18:12                             ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-28 19:15                               ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 19:25                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-28 19:36                                   ` [PATCH -v1.3] " Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 19:42                                   ` [PATCH -v1.1] " H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-28 19:49                                     ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 19:54                                       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 19:58                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-28 20:08                                           ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 23:13                                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-29  9:14                                               ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-29 15:17                                                 ` [PATCH -v1.4] " Borislav Petkov
2013-09-29 15:44                                                 ` [PATCH -v1.1] " H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-30  6:28                                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-30  9:56                                                     ` Borislav Petkov
2013-10-01  8:53                                                       ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-01  9:10                                                       ` [tip:x86/boot] x86/boot: " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2013-10-02 11:52                                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-02 12:18                                                           ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-02 12:20                                                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-02 13:55                                                             ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 19:58                                     ` [PATCH -v1.1] x86, boot: " Ingo Molnar
2013-09-28 20:10                                       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-29  5:10                                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-29  2:55                   ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: Cleanup boot CPUs table Mike Galbraith
2013-09-28  8:28                 ` [tip:x86/boot] x86: Improve the printout of the SMP bootup CPU table tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2013-09-29  4:25                   ` Yinghai Lu
2013-09-27 12:48           ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/smpboot: Fix announce_cpu() to printk() the last "OK" properly Borislav Petkov
2013-09-27 13:33             ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130928082542.GA18198@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=huawei.libin@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).